跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00958360
NCT00958360已完成2 期

VA Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT) II

VA Office of Research and Development7 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 323 人开始时间: 2010年8月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
323
试验地点
7
主要终点
Comparison of Changes in Visual Reading Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire

研究概览

简要总结

This study will determine if the interdisciplinary team low vision rehabilitation program is more effective than basic low vision care provided by an optometrist working alone in improving visual reading ability in veterans with macular diseases and best corrected visual acuity of 20/50 to 20/200.

详细描述

Key Questions: The purpose of our proposed single-masked multicenter randomized controlled trial is to determine if the Interdisciplinary Team approach to low vision service delivery is more effective than the Basic Low Vision Service in improving visual reading ability for 330 veterans with macular diseases and best corrected visual acuity of 20/50-20/200. Effectiveness will be measured with the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VA LV VFQ-48), a valid and reliable questionnaire that is administered by telephone to capture changes in patients' self-report of their difficulty reading and performing other daily living activities affected by visual impairment before and after rehabilitation. The primary outcome measure is the comparison of changes in patients' visual reading ability on the VA LV VFQ-48 after they receive low vision care from the Interdisciplinary Team or Basic Low Vision Care program. The secondary outcome measures are comparisons of changes in other VA LV VFQ-48 visual ability scores (overall, mobility, visual information processing, visual motor skills). Hypothesis: The improvement in visual reading ability measured with the VA LV VFQ-48 will be larger for patients who received low vision services from the Interdisciplinary Team than for patients who received the Basic Low Vision Service. Specific Aims:(1) Compare the mean changes in patients' visual reading ability (estimated from patients' difficulty ratings of reading items on the VA LV VFQ-48 before and after low vision service delivery) in the Interdisciplinary Team and Basic Low Vision Care Programs.(2) Compare the mean changes in visual ability [patients' difficulty ratings of other items on the VA LV VFQ-48 (mobility, visual information processing, visual motor skills) before and after low vision service delivery] in the Interdisciplinary Team and Basic Low Vision Care programs.(3). Identify the characteristics of patients who benefit from the Interdisciplinary Team and Basic Low Vision Service. (4). Conduct an economic evaluation to compare the costs and cost effectiveness of the Interdisciplinary Team and Basic Low Vision Service.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Primary eye diagnosis (better seeing Eye) macular disease
  • •Best-corrected visual acuity (better seeing eye) 20/50-20/200

排除标准

  • •Does not have a telephone
  • •Does not speak English
  • •Has received interdisciplinary low vision services
  • •English literacy less that 5th grade reading level
  • •Failed TICS
  • •Unable or unwilling to attend required clinic visits
  • •Severe hearing impairment preventing administration of telephone questionnaires
  • •Planned cataract extraction in next 4 months
  • •Visual fields contracted to diameter of 20 degrees in better-seeing eye
  • •Vitreous hemorrhage or serous hemorrhagic detachment of macula
  • •CNVM treated with fewer than 3 anti-VEGF injections
  • •Diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with focal/grid laser within the last two months
  • •DME treated with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF or intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) within the last two months
  • •Cystoid macular edema (CME) treated with topical (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) NSAIDS, topical steroids or IVTA within the last three months

研究组 & 干预措施

Arm 1

Experimental

Interdisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation: Low vision examination, prescription and dispensing of low vision devices, low vision therapy and homework.

干预措施: Interdisciplinary Low Vision Service (Other)

Arm 2

Active Comparator

Basic Low Vision Care: Low vision examination, prescription and dispensing of low vision devices without low vision therapy or assigned homework.

干预措施: Basic Low Vision Service (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Comparison of Changes in Visual Reading Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire

时间窗: changes from baseline to 4 months later

The range of scores for the Visual Reading Ability subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.

次要结局

  • Comparison of Changes in Mobility From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire(changes from baseline to 4 months later)
  • Comparison of Changes in Visual Information Processing From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire(changes from baseline to 4 months later)
  • Comparison of Changes in Visual Motor Skills From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire(changes from baseline to 4 months later)
  • Comparison of Overall Visual Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire(changes from baseline to 4 months later)

研究者

申办方类型
Fed
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (7)

Loading locations...

相似试验