Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Interventions
- Drug: cellgram-spine
- Registration Number
- NCT01676441
- Lead Sponsor
- Pharmicell Co., Ltd.
- Brief Summary
This phase II/III clinical trial is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSC) transplanted directly into the injured spinal cord.
- Detailed Description
The Principal investigator has performed a clinical trial using autologous MSCs in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. The results revealed the safety of autologous MSC. This Phase II, III single-center trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation direct to injured spinal cord site via laminectomy. After recovery from the operation, the subjects receive 4 weeks of physical and occupational therapy.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Aged between 16-65 years
- Traumatic spinal cord injury at the level of cervical
- American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale B
- 12 months or more post spinal cord injury subject with stable neurological finding after more than 1 month rehabilitation therapy
- No signs of contracture
- Good physical condition to go through operation
- Must be willing and able to participate in study procedures with no mental and verbal problem
- Able to consent by patients or legal representatives
- Serum SGOT/SGPT > 3 X upper limit of normal or Creatinine > 1.5 X upper limit of normal
- Major surgical procedure in the past 3 months
- Penetrating injury
- Mechanical ventilation
- Serious pre-existing medical conditions
- Recently diagnosed infection (Urinary tract infection, Pneumonia etc)
- Positive skin test for penicillin
- Positive result for viral markers (human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test)
- Pregnant women, women of childbearing potential who do not want adequate contraception, breastfeeding females
- Unwilling to participate in study
- Patients with psychiatric disorder severe as to make compliance with the treatment unlike, and signing informed consent impossible
- Drug abuse in the past 1 year
- Participating in other clinical trials in the past 1 month
- Inappropriate patients to participate in the study according to the chief investigator
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description cellgram-spine cellgram-spine posterior cervical laminectomy and Mesenchymal stem cells tranplantation. After laminectomy, 1.6X10\^7 and 3.2 X10\^7 Autologous Mesenchymal stem cells is injected into the intramedullary and intrathecal space respectively
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compared change of Motor Score of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale Baseline, post operation(24 hours), 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month Compared Baseline and after 6, 12 months of cell treatment, ASIA motor test analyzes the proportion of patients with a motor grade of more than 2 devision, with a motor grade improving from 2 to 3 and a rise of 5 or more in total score.
\<American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale\> 0 Total paralysis
1. Palpable or visible contraction
2. Active movement, full Range Of Motion(ROM) with gravity eliminated
3. Active movement, full ROM against gravity
4. Active movement, full ROM against gravity and moderate resistance in a muscle specific position
5. (normal) Active movement, full ROM against gravity and full resistance in a functional muscle position expected from an otherwise unimpaired person 5\* (normal) Active movement, full ROM against gravity and sufficient resistance to be considered normal if identified inhibiting factors (i.e. pain, disuse) were not present NT Not testable
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Electrophysiological change (Motor Evoked Potentials-MEP, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials-SSEP) 6 months Post 6 months of treatment, the validity is analyzed through patients who have expressed their responses to the electrophysiological test (Motor Evoked Potentials-MEP, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials-SSEP).
Sensory score of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale Baseline, post operation(24 hours), 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month Analyze the difference between the pre and post of the ASIA sensory score by using the Study's pre-test (Wilcoxon's signed test).
\<American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale\> The exam is based on neurological responses, touch and pinprick sensations tested in each dermatome, and strength of the muscles that control key motions on both sides of the body. Sensation is graded on a scale of 0-2: 0 is no sensation, 1 is altered or decreased sensation, and 2 is full sensation. Each side of the body is graded independently. When an area is not available (e.g. because of an amputation or cast), it is recorded as "NT", "not testable".MRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging of spinal cord 6 months Post 6 months of cell treatment, the ratio of patients with changes in magnetic resonance imaging is analyzed.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Asan medical center
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of