MedPath

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Globus Pallidus (GP) in Huntington's Disease (HD)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Huntington Disease
Registration Number
NCT02535884
Lead Sponsor
Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf
Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to prove the efficacy and safety of pallidal DBS in HD patients and to show superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to stimulation-off group

Detailed Description

In this study the efficacy and safety of pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in HD patients shall be investigated and superiority of DBS on motor function in the stimulation group compared to the stimulation-off group shall be shown. This study is a prospective, randomised, double blind, parallel group, sham-controlled, multi-centre trial. Patients in the stimulation group will be stimulated for three months while the stimulator in the sham-group will be turned off for three months. After three months the primary endpoint will be assessed. Afterwards the stimulator will be turned on in all patients.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
48
Inclusion Criteria
  • Clinically symptomatic and genetically confirmed HD (number of CAG repeats ≥ 36)
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Moderate stage of the disease (UHDRS motor score ≥ 30)
  • Chorea despite best medical treatment (UHDRS chorea subscore ≥ 10)
  • Mattis Dementia Rating Scale ≥ 120 (or > 80% of items testable independently from motor impairment)
  • Patient has stable medication prior six weeks before inclusion
  • Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Juvenile HD (Westphal variant) or predominant bradykinesia
  • Postural instability with UHDRS retropulsion score > 2
  • Severe comorbidity compromising operability and/or life expectancy and/or quality of life during the trial duration (e.g. cancer with life expectancy < 6 months, NYHA 3 and 4 rising the anaesthetic risk according to the anaesthesiologist)
  • Acute suicidality
  • Acute psychosis (symptoms within previous 6 months)
  • Participation in any interventional clinical trial within 2 months before screening
  • Cortical atrophy grade 3
  • Patients with risk of coagulopathies and/or increased risk of haemorrhage
  • Patients with an implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Pregnancy
  • lactation

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
UHDRS-TMS difference12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference between the groups in the UHDRS total motor score (UHDRS-TMS) at 12 weeks postoperatively compared to baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
UHDRS-bradykinesia difference6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the UHDRS bradykinesia subscore (items 22-25 and 27-29)

HADS-SIS difference6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale combined with Snaith Irritability Scale (HADS-SIS)

SF 36 difference6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)

UHDRS-Chorea difference6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) chorea subscore (items 14-20)

BFMDRS difference6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor score

Reilmann Battery differences6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the Q-Motor "choreomotography" test (Reilmann Battery)

MDRS difference6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS)

PBA-s difference6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the Problem Behaviours Assessment Short Form (PBA-s)

CGI difference6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)

Verbal Fluency Test difference6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the Verbal Fluency Test (formal lexical, categorical, category change)

STROOP Test differences6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in STROOP word reading, colour naming and colour of the word naming

SDMT difference6 months postoperatively compared to baseline

Difference in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

Trial Locations

Locations (12)

Medizinische Universität Innsbruck

🇦🇹

Innsbruck, Austria

CHU Amiens Hôpital nord, Department of neurosurgery and Department of neurology

🇫🇷

Amiens, France

Hôpital Roger Salengro, Service de Neurologie et Pathologie du mouvement

🇫🇷

Lille Cedex, France

Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

University hospital Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

🇩🇪

Düsseldorf, Germany

University Hospital Freiburg

🇩🇪

Freiburg, Germany

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

🇩🇪

Kiel, Germany

Universität zu Lübeck

🇩🇪

Lubeck Hansestadt, Germany

University hospital Munich LMU

🇩🇪

Munich, Germany

kbo-Isar-Amper-Clinic Taufkirchen

🇩🇪

Taufkirchen, Germany

Scroll for more (2 remaining)
Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
🇦🇹Innsbruck, Austria

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.