Evaluation of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus a Comparator in Adult Subjects With Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) With Risk for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
- Conditions
- Infections
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT01645735
- Lead Sponsor
- Forest Laboratories
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe for the treatment of patients with Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) at risk for infection due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
- Detailed Description
A Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and safety of Ceftaroline fosamil Versus Ceftriaxone Plus Vancomycin in Adult Subjects with Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia at Risk for Infection Due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 49
-
Subjects are required to meet All of the following inclusion criteria:
- Male or female, ≥ 18 years old
- Presence of CABP requiring hospitalization
- Presence of CABP meeting the following criteria:
I. confirmed pneumonia (new or progressive pulmonary) II. Acute illness (≤ 7 days' duration) with at least 3 clinical signs or symptoms consistent with a lower respiratory tract infection
MRSA Risk Factors
• MRSA-positive blood culture or respiratory specimen or a risk factor for MRSA such as a history of colonization with MRSA
-
Subjects must Not meet any of the following exclusion criteria at baseline:
- History of any hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam antimicrobial
- Suspected or microbiologically-documented infection with a pathogen known to be resistant to any of the study drugs
- Non-infectious causes of pulmonary infiltrates (eg, pulmonary embolism, chemical pneumonitis from aspiration, hypersensitivity pneumonia, congestive heart failure)
- More than 24 hours of potentially effective systemic antibacterial therapy for CABP within 96 hours before randomization
- End-stage renal disease [Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) < 15], including hemodialysis
- Evidence of significant hepatic, hematological, or immunocompromising condition
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Ceftriaxone plus vancomycin Ceftriaxone plus vancomycin Ceftriaxone 2 g IV over 30 minutes once per day (q24h) plus vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV every 12 hours (q12h) initially and then dose adjusted based on trough concentrations; treatment duration 5 to 14 days Ceftaroline Ceftaroline fosamil Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg Intravenous (IV) administration over 60 minutes, every 8 hours (q8h); dosing to be adjusted for renal function; treatment duration 5 to 14 days
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical Response at Study Day 4 in the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population Study Day 4 Clinical response was defined as meeting all of the following criteria:
* Symptom Improvement - Improvement in at least 2 and no worsening of any of the following symptoms compared to baseline:
* Cough
* Dyspnea
* Sputum production
* Chest pain
* Clinical Stability (per Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) guidelines; Mandell et al, 2007):
* Temperature ≤ 37.8°C
* Heart rate ≤ 100 beats/min
* Respiratory rate ≤ 24 breaths/min
* Systolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg
* Oxygen saturation ≥ 90%
* Confusion/disorientation absentClinical Outcome at Test of Cure (TOC) in the MITT Population Test of Cure, an average of 3 weeks An assessment of clinical outcome was made by the Investigator at TOC. The clinical outcome categories were:
Cure: Resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of CABP or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was required
Failure: Subjects who meet either of the following criteria:
* Incomplete resolution or worsening of CABP signs and symptoms or development of new CABP signs or symptoms requiring alternative nonstudy antimicrobial therapy
* Death in which CABP is contributory
Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason, including:
* Death in which CABP is clearly noncontributory
* Lost to follow-up
* Extenuating circumstances precluding classification as a cure or failure
A favorable clinical outcome at Test-of Cure (TOC) was clinical cure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Investigational Site
🇺🇦Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine