跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01645735
NCT01645735已完成4 期

A Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Ceftriaxone Plus Vancomycin in Adult Subjects With Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia at Risk for Infection Due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

Forest Laboratories1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 49 人开始时间: 2012年10月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
49
试验地点
1
主要终点
Clinical Response at Study Day 4 in the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe for the treatment of patients with Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) at risk for infection due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

详细描述

A Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and safety of Ceftaroline fosamil Versus Ceftriaxone Plus Vancomycin in Adult Subjects with Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia at Risk for Infection Due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Subjects are required to meet All of the following inclusion criteria:
  • Male or female, ≥ 18 years old
  • Presence of CABP requiring hospitalization
  • Presence of CABP meeting the following criteria:
  • I. confirmed pneumonia (new or progressive pulmonary) II. Acute illness (≤ 7 days' duration) with at least 3 clinical signs or symptoms consistent with a lower respiratory tract infection
  • MRSA Risk Factors
  • MRSA-positive blood culture or respiratory specimen or a risk factor for MRSA such as a history of colonization with MRSA

排除标准

  • Subjects must Not meet any of the following exclusion criteria at baseline:
  • History of any hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam antimicrobial
  • Suspected or microbiologically-documented infection with a pathogen known to be resistant to any of the study drugs
  • Non-infectious causes of pulmonary infiltrates (eg, pulmonary embolism, chemical pneumonitis from aspiration, hypersensitivity pneumonia, congestive heart failure)
  • More than 24 hours of potentially effective systemic antibacterial therapy for CABP within 96 hours before randomization
  • End-stage renal disease [Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) < 15], including hemodialysis
  • Evidence of significant hepatic, hematological, or immunocompromising condition

研究组 & 干预措施

Ceftaroline

Experimental

Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg Intravenous (IV) administration over 60 minutes, every 8 hours (q8h); dosing to be adjusted for renal function; treatment duration 5 to 14 days

干预措施: Ceftaroline fosamil (Drug)

Ceftriaxone plus vancomycin

Active Comparator

Ceftriaxone 2 g IV over 30 minutes once per day (q24h) plus vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV every 12 hours (q12h) initially and then dose adjusted based on trough concentrations; treatment duration 5 to 14 days

干预措施: Ceftriaxone plus vancomycin (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical Response at Study Day 4 in the Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) Population

时间窗: Study Day 4

Clinical response was defined as meeting all of the following criteria: * Symptom Improvement - Improvement in at least 2 and no worsening of any of the following symptoms compared to baseline: * Cough * Dyspnea * Sputum production * Chest pain * Clinical Stability (per Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) guidelines; Mandell et al, 2007): * Temperature ≤ 37.8°C * Heart rate ≤ 100 beats/min * Respiratory rate ≤ 24 breaths/min * Systolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg * Oxygen saturation ≥ 90% * Confusion/disorientation absent

Clinical Outcome at Test of Cure (TOC) in the MITT Population

时间窗: Test of Cure, an average of 3 weeks

An assessment of clinical outcome was made by the Investigator at TOC. The clinical outcome categories were: Cure: Resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of CABP or improvement to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy was required Failure: Subjects who meet either of the following criteria: * Incomplete resolution or worsening of CABP signs and symptoms or development of new CABP signs or symptoms requiring alternative nonstudy antimicrobial therapy * Death in which CABP is contributory Indeterminate: Study data are not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason, including: * Death in which CABP is clearly noncontributory * Lost to follow-up * Extenuating circumstances precluding classification as a cure or failure A favorable clinical outcome at Test-of Cure (TOC) was clinical cure.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Forest Laboratories
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Evaluation of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus a... | 临床试验