跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01771419
NCT01771419Unknown不适用

Comparison Of Loop-Tip Wire Vs Tradictional Technique In The Cannulation Of The Common Bile Duct

Hospital San Paolo2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 320 人开始时间: 2010年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
320
试验地点
2
主要终点
post ERCP pancreatitis rate

研究概览

简要总结

Selective cannulation of common bile duct (CBD) by insertion of a guide-wire seems to be associated with fewer complications and post-ERCP (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) pancreatitis (PEP) rate than the conventional biliary tree access with cannulotome (CT-25 Cook Medical) with contrast injection even if results are conflicting. the aim of our study is to test a new guide-wire (loop-tip wire), with a loop in the tip, for the prevention of PEP and biliary tree access, in PEP high-risk patients.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • high-risk patients for post-ERCP pancreatitis

排除标准

  • age < 18 years
  • allargy to the contrast medium
  • previous biliary or gastric surgery
  • neoplastic patients
  • previous biliary or pancreatic sphincterotomy

结局指标

主要结局

post ERCP pancreatitis rate

时间窗: up to 4 weeks

participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

次要结局

  • Number of attempts to obtain the cannulation of CBD and number of participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability(up to 4 weeks)

研究者

发起方
Hospital San Paolo
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Benedetto Mangiavillano

MD

Hospital San Paolo

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison Of Loop-Tip Wire Vs Tradictional... | 临床试验