Randomised Study Assessing Urinary Continence following Robotic Radical Prostatectomy with or without an intraoperative 'RoboSling'.
- Conditions
- Prostate CancerUrinary IncontinenceCancer - ProstateRenal and Urogenital - Other renal and urogenital disorders
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12618002058257
- Lead Sponsor
- Sydney Local Health District
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 120
To be eligible to enter the study all patients must satisfy the following criteria:
1. Adult men aged 18 years and over
2. Undergoing prostatectomy for prostate cancer at RPA hospital in Sydney, Australia
3. Clinically suitable for robotic prostatectomy
4. Cognitively able to give written informed consent for participation
5. Elective procedure
Patients will be excluded if they present the following exclusion criteria:
1. The patient lacks the ability to consent for themselves
2. Patient or tumour factors precluding robotic surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine the impact of incorporating the RoboSling procedure with<br>robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) surgeryon early (3 months) and late (1 year) post-operative urinary continence, compared to RARP alone. This will be measures by the rate of patient reported continence defined as 0 urinary pad usage per day at 3 months and 1 year post-operatively.<br>[ 3-months and 1-year post-operative]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method