Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03708458
NCT03708458
Unknown
Phase 4

Comparative Evaluation of Standard Prophylaxis Versus Divided-dose NSAIDs or Hybrid NSAID and N-acetylcysteine Therapy for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy1 site in 1 country250 target enrollmentApril 1, 2017

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
indomethacin suppository
Conditions
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Sponsor
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Enrollment
250
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Number of patients who develop post ERCP pancreatitis
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators aimed to perform a comparative study, evaluating the efficacy of three prophylactic approaches aiming to reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis, using pharmacologic agents with different mechanisms of action (NSAIDs and/or acetylcysteine) in three different regimens.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 1, 2017
End Date
December 15, 2018
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

PAVEL LAURA

Principal Investigator, PhD Student

Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • age 18 years and older
  • diagnosis of choledocholithiasis
  • indication for ERCP procedures
  • willingness to participate in the study
  • the ability to sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • presence of acute pancreatitis or other inflammatory diseases at admission
  • pregnancy
  • contraindication for NSAID administration
  • recent episode of upper digestive bleeding (less than one month)
  • hypersensibility to antioxidants hypersensibility to antioxidants
  • the necessity of a prophylactic pancreatic stent insertion
  • patients' disapproval to take part in the study

Arms & Interventions

Control group

Control group - patients receiving 100 mg indomethacin suppository immediately post ERCP

Intervention: indomethacin suppository

Group A

Group A - patients receiving N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 600 mg before performing ERCP and indomethacin suppository 50 mg before and after performing ERCP

Intervention: indomethacin suppository

Group A

Group A - patients receiving N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 600 mg before performing ERCP and indomethacin suppository 50 mg before and after performing ERCP

Intervention: N-acetylcysteine (NAC)

Group B

Group B - patients receiving indomethacin suppository 50 mg before and 50 mg after ERCP

Intervention: indomethacin suppository

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of patients who develop post ERCP pancreatitis

Time Frame: 24 hours post ERCP

Comparing and evaluating the efficacy of three pharmacological combination therapies (Indomethacin +/- N-acetylcysteine), aiming to prevent acute post ERCP pancreatitis

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Phase 2
Comparison of 3 commonly used anaesthetic drugs - Ketamine, Midazolam and Pethidine, given in 3 different combinations, administered via intravenous route to prevent post spinal shiveringHealth Condition 1: null- shivering post neuraxial anaesthesia
CTRI/2018/01/011430Kasturba Medical College
Completed
Phase 3
The comparison of different prophylactic techniques in hypotension due to spinal anesthesia on mothers hemodynamic changes and neonatal outcome in cesarean sectioComplications of anaesthesia during pregnancy.Other complications of anaesthesia during pregnancy
IRCT201107062405N7Vice chancellor for research- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences300
Completed
Not Applicable
PENELOPE Observational Study: Prophylaxis and Treatment of Arterial and Venous ThromboembolismHematologic NeoplasmAcute LeukemiaMyelodysplastic SyndromeLymphomaMultiple Myeloma
NCT01855698Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto99
Active, not recruiting
Phase 2
An Open Comparative Study of the Effectiveness and Incomparable Study of the Immunogenicity and Safety of the Vaccine (CoviVac) for Adults Aged 60 Years and OlderCorona Virus InfectionVaccineCOVID-19
NCT05765773Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products200
Recruiting
Phase 3
An Open Comprative Study of the Prophylactic Efficacy and a Non-comparative Study of the Immunogenicity and Safety of the Inactivated Whole-virion Concentrated Purified Coronavirus Vaccine (CoviVac)Coronavirus InfectionsVaccine
NCT05407142Chumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products29,000