MedPath

Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (Fujifilm) for Polyp Detection in Colonoscopy

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Suspected Colon Polyps
Screening Colonoscopy
Colonoscopic Control After Polypectomy
Interventions
Procedure: colonoscopy
Registration Number
NCT04894708
Lead Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Brief Summary

Colonoscopy is currently the best method of detection of intestinal tumors and polyps, particularly because polyps can also be biopsied and removed. There is a clear correlation between the adenoma detection rate and prevented carcinomas, so adenoma detection rate is the main parameter for the outcome quality of diagnostic colonoscopy. The efficiency of preventive colonoscopy needs optimisation by increase in adenoma detection rate, as it is known from many studies that approximately 15-30% of all adenomas can be overlooked. This mainly applies to smaller and flat adenomas. However, since even smaller polyps may be relevant for colorectal cancer development, the aim of colonoscopy should be to preferably be able to recognize all polyps and other changes.The latest and by far the most interesting development in this field is the use of artificial intelligence systems. They consist of a switched-on software with a small computer connected to the endoscope processor; the patient's introduced endoscope is completely unchanged.

The present study therefore compares the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of the latest generation of devices with high-resolution imaging from Fujifilm with and without the connection of artificial intelligence.

Detailed Description

Methods of Computer Vision (CV) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) provide completely new opportunities, e.g. in the automatic polyp detection and differentiation of a lesion based on its endoscopic image. Computer vision using artificial intelligence methods means the application of "trained" so-called deep neural net (DNN) with a set of defined images (e.g. everyday scenes) and well-known solutions ( e.g. name of the pictured item; c.f. e.g. the "ImageNet Challenge"). The technical feasibility of using AI algorithms in endoscopy has already been proven in many cases. In the present study, it is an AI system from Fujifilm, which is already clinically usable. By using Fujifilm high-resolution imaging devices in colonoscopies, AI will be added randomly.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1572
Inclusion Criteria
  • Persons> 35 years of age who are capable of giving informed consent
  • Planned diagnostic colonoscopy (clarification of symptoms, polyp follow-up)
  • Screening colonoscopy for men >50 or women > 55 years of age
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Colon bleeding
  • Colon carcinoma
  • Known polyps for removal
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Colonic stenosis
  • Other suspected colon disease for further clarification
  • Follow-up care after colon cancer surgery (partial colon resection)
  • Anticoagulant drugs that make a biopsy or polypectomy impossible
  • Poor general condition (ASA IV)
  • Incomplete colonoscopy planned
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
AI colonoscopycolonoscopycolonoscopy with artificial intelligence added
conventional colonoscopycolonoscopyconventional colonoscopy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Adenoma detection rateduring procedure to histological examination result, approximately 2 days

Difference in adenoma detection rate (all adenomas/all patients) between the two groups

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Switching number (BLI, LCI) in both groupsduring procedure

number of switches to visual support by colour filters

incidence of reasons for switching to BLI/LCIduring procedure

reasons for switching to visual support by colour filters

Patient rate differenceduring procedure to histological examination result, approximately 2 days

Differences in the patient rate with adenomas (adenoma detection rate, i.e. rate of patients with at least one adenoma)

rate of polyp detection in preventive and diagnostic colonoscopyduring procedure to histological examination result, approximately 2 days

Differences in preventive vs. diagnostic colonoscopy

quality of polyp detection rate by image evaluationuntil 2 months after recruitment stop

differential diagnosis of colon polyps in both groups with/without CADEYE)

rate of hyperplastic polyp detection in both groupshistological examination result, approximately 2 days

Differences in the detection of hyperplastic polyps

Adenoma subgroup differenceshistological examination result, approximately 2 days

Differences subgroups of adenomas (flat, small, high-grade dysplasia)

Trial Locations

Locations (10)

GastroZentrum Lippe

🇩🇪

Bad Salzuflen, Germany

Gastroenterologiepraxis Dr. Moog

🇩🇪

Kassel, Hessen, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

🇩🇪

Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany

University Hospital Bonn

🇩🇪

Bonn, Germany

University Hospital Eppendorf

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

St. Vinzenz-Hospital / Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität zu Köln

🇩🇪

Köln, Germany

University Hospital Magdeburg

🇩🇪

Magdeburg, Germany

Marienhospital Osnabrück

🇩🇪

Osnabrück, Germany

Asklepios Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden

🇩🇪

Wiesbaden, Germany

Gastroenterologie am Bayerischen Platz

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath