MedPath

Impact of Magnetic Resonance and Biomarkers for Screening for Prostate Cancer. Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Conditions
Establish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes in Terms of the Aggressiveness of the Tumors According to the Gleason Classification
Establish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes in Terms of Morbidity Associated With the Technique
Establish the Possible Interaction Between Biomarkers and Resonance in Different Prostate Biopsy Models to Define Tumor Presence and / or Tumor Aggressiveness
Establish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes in Terms of the Patient's Subjective Perception Regarding Pain and Quality of Life
Establish the Association of the Tumor Biomarker in the Early Detection and Aggressiveness of Tumors
Establish the Possible Relationship Between the Expression Profiles of the microRNAs
Establish if There Are Differences Between Transrectal and Transperineal Prostatic Biopsy Schemes in Both Cases With and Without MRI
Interventions
Procedure: Multiparametric magnetic resonance
Registration Number
NCT04283032
Lead Sponsor
InvestigatorUrologyIBSAL
Brief Summary

Objectives: To establish if there are differences between an ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy (BPTE) and a transperineal prostatic biopsy (BPTP) with and without a multiparametric Magnetic Resonance (RMmp) in patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PC) to first prostatic biopsy in terms of:

1. Rate of detection and diagnosis of prostate cancer.

2. Aggressiveness of the detected tumors.

3. Association of the marker \[-2\] proPSA and the prostate cancer health index (PHI) and microRNAs for the diagnosis of tumors.

4. Adverse effects of the intervention and subjective perception of the patient: pain and degree of satisfaction, and impairment of quality of life.

5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the different intervention options.

Study Design: Randomized, single-blind prospective clinical study to compare four schemes: RMmp + BPTE vs. BPTE 12 cylinders vs RMmp + BPTP vs BPTP 12 cylinders.

Study population: Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer with PSA between 3-20 ng / mL and normal or abnormal rectal examination, candidates for a first prostate biopsy.

Research techniques: BPTE standard of 12 cylinders compared to RMmp previous to BPTE vs BPTP of 12 cylinders compared to BPTP with previous RMmp.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
628
Inclusion Criteria
  • Signature of informed consent prior to performing any of the specific procedures of the study
  • Age between 50 * - 75 years (* 45 years, if family history)
  • Patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer
  • Indication of a first biopsy during the study period.
  • Life expectancy greater than 10 years.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients previously randomized in the present study.
  • Patients submitted prior to a prostate biopsy.
  • Patients with a previous diagnosis of prostate cancer and / or previous prostate surgery.
  • Patients with a previous episode of acute prostatitis of infectious origin in the 3 months prior to inclusion in the study.
  • Patients with an active urinary tract infection and / or any previous pathology of severity in the 3 months prior to inclusion.
  • Impossibility of performing transrectal or transperineal biopsy and / or magnetic resonance.
  • Patients who have received hormonal treatment prior to androgen blockade in the 6 months prior to inclusion in the study.
  • History of other tumors.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Multiparametric magnetic resonance + transrectal biopsyMultiparametric magnetic resonanceThe patient underwent a previous multiparametric magnetic resonance (RMmp) and a transrectal biopsy (BPTE)
Multiparametric magnetic resonance + transperineal biopsyMultiparametric magnetic resonanceThe patient underwent a previous multiparametric magnetic resonance (RMmp) and a transperineal biopsy (BPTP)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparation between transrectal and transperineal prostatic biopsy with o without Magnetic Resonance6 months

Establish if there are differences between the transrectal and transperineal prostatic biopsy schemes in both cases with and without MRI, in patients with suspected clinical risk of prostate cancer (total PSA between 3 and 20 ng / mL, free PSA index / Total PSA less than 20% and normal or abnormal rectal examination) in terms of efficacy measured by the detection rate and tumor aggressiveness of the tumors detected, complication rates and cost analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Francisco Gómez Veiga

🇪🇸

Salamanca, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath