跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01668290
NCT01668290已完成不适用

Assessment of Patients With Suspected CAD: What is the Best Initial Imaging Strategy? Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography,(CCTA) vs Stress Echocardiography (SE) vs SPECT

Harald Becher1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 173 人开始时间: 2012年7月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
173
试验地点
1
主要终点
healthcare resource utilization

研究概览

简要总结

Patients who present with chest pain are investigated with tests designed to confirm or exclude the presence of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), as well as determine risk of poor outcome. It is not known which imaging test would be best when used first for investigating a patient presenting with exertional chest pain. This trial is designed to compare outcomes of the use of coronary CT, stress echocardiography and nuclear perfusion (SPECT) in a pilot study. Patients with no history of coronary disease presenting with chest pain will be randomly assigned to one of the three test modalities as the initial imaging test. The three imaging strategies will be compared regarding the subsequent use of healthcare resources over a year.

详细描述

This is a pilot study on imaging strategies for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The pilot trial aims to answer the question "Which non-invasive test (single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), stress echocardiography or coronary CT angiography (CCTA)) is the best first test in suspected coronary artery disease with respect to patient outcome and downstream health costs?" Patients are randomly assigned to one of the imaging modalities. All imaging and therapeutic procedures in this trial are clinically indicated. The only change from standard patient management is the selection of the initial imaging test. Instead of leaving the selection of the initial imaging test to the referring physician (whose decision is not evidence based), patients presenting with chest pain that fall into the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study will be randomly assigned to one of the imaging modalities. Patients will also be followed at 1, 6 and 12 months after enrolment to determine outcomes. The three imaging strategies will be compared regarding subsequent use of healthcare resources over a year. In most large cardiac centres, different imaging modalities are performed by different specialists and therefore an operating grant from one imaging specialty rarely covers the costs of other imaging specialties in comparative studies. To ensure a fair comparison between modalities, all modalities have to be equal. Previous comparative trials have been criticized for being biased towards the technique being promoted by the principal investigator. This trial is unique in that the directors of nuclear cardiology, coronary computed tomography and echocardiography are all specialists in their field and are running state-of-the-art services and were all involved in the early planning of this trial and their involvement has ensured trial design meets clinical need. The results of this trial will give insight into planning of a larger multicentre, multi-national study.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Adult Age ≥ 18 years
  • Presenting with symptoms suggestive of CAD requiring diagnostic/prognostic workup
  • Suitable for Contrast Stress Echocardiography, SPECT and CCTA
  • Able and willing to provide consent

排除标准

  • Patients with documented CAD (previous invasive angiography, previous STEMI, previous PCI or CABG)
  • NSTEMI, ACS within 3 months
  • Previous diagnostic imaging tests in the past 6 months
  • Women who are pregnant as evidenced by positive pregnancy test
  • Breast feeding females
  • Significant valvular heart disease (i.e. severe aortic stenosis or regurgitation or severe mitral regurgitation)
  • Hemodynamic instability (blood pressure >210/110 ml/Hg or <90/60 mm/Hg)
  • Unavailability for follow-up
  • Renal insufficiency, eGFR < 30 ml/minute unless on dialysis
  • Known allergy to x-ray or echo contrast agents
  • Weight exceeding specifications of nuclear equipment (>250 Kg)
  • Unable to give informed consent

结局指标

主要结局

healthcare resource utilization

时间窗: 12 month

次要结局

  • hospital admissions for angina(12 month)
  • radiation exposure from the initial and subsequent imaging procedures(12 month)
  • total mortality(12 month)
  • referral rates to coronary angiography following three different initial imaging tests in this patient population.(12 month)
  • coronary lesions which warrant revascularization (including those where it was warranted but not technically possible).(12 month)
  • freedom from angina(12 month)
  • non-fatal myocardial infarction(12 month)

研究者

发起方
Harald Becher
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Harald Becher

Heart and Stroke Foundation Chair for Cardiovascular Research

University of Alberta

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验