Fostering Eating After Stroke With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Dysphagia
Stroke

Interventions: Device: tDCS

Registration Number: NCT01919112

Lead Sponsor: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Brief Summary: Swallowing difficulties are common after a stroke and can lead to serious complications like pneumonia and malnutrition. Unfortunately, there are no effective treatment for improving swallowing in stroke patients.

Previous investigations have shown that recovery of swallowing functions occurs from reorganization ("rewiring") of the non-involved cerebral hemisphere. In this study, the investigators propose to investigate a new intervention, which combines, swallowing exercises with brain stimulation targeted to the non-involved cerebral hemisphere, using low intensity current in acute stroke patients. The investigators plan to assess the safety of this technique in this patient population and also assess its effect on improving swallowing functions and swallowing physiology. During this time trial participants will undergo standardized swallowing and neurological assessments as well as brain MRI scans.

Detailed Description: Swallowing impairments are a common and a serious complication of stroke but lack effective therapies. The study investigators herein propose to conduct a prospective clinical study using a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), in combination with swallowing exercises for improving dysphagia due to an acute-subacute hemispheric infarction, and obtain data on safety and effect of 2 different doses of tDCS, on swallowing physiology and behavior. Dysphagia from hemispheric strokes occurs due to disruption of the cortical projections to the brainstem swallowing centers while recovery of swallowing functions have been shown to be mediated via the reorganization of the swallowing cortex in the unaffected hemisphere. A recent pilot study conducted by the investigators demonstrated the safety and feasibility of applying 5 consecutive daily sessions of anodal tDCS for 30 minutes to the swallowing cortex on the unaffected hemisphere in the acute-subacute stroke phases and showed a promise in improving dysphagia, when combined with swallowing exercises. The proposed research will be used to further confirm safety of this technique in early stroke phases and explore alternative, more effective doses for promoting swallowing recovery prior to its examination in any confirmatory trials. The investigators will use the study cohort to examine important subject specific parameters which influence response to the proposed intervention in dysphagic stroke patients. The overall aim of this study is to gather additional safety data on cumulative sessions of tDCS in acute-subacute phases of stroke, obtain information about effects of this intervention on important physiological and clinically relevant swallowing parameters, examine possible dose effects, and identify candidates who are more likely to benefit from this intervention. The experience gained from this project will guide planning of future confirmatory trials that use relevant clinical outcomes to assess potential benefits of this intervention and utilize important subject specific parameters to refine study inclusion criteria and aid in severity adjusted analysis.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 42

Inclusion Criteria

21 years or older in age since safety of non-invasive cortical stimulation in children.
Between 25 hours (day 2) to 144 (day 6) hours since stroke onset.
Unilateral hemispheric infarction (cortical or subcortical infarction) documented by imaging.
Moderate to severe dysphagia with a score of 4 or more on Penetration and Aspiration Scale (PAS)

Exclusion Criteria

Prior history of swallowing difficulties.
Drowsiness or marked cognitive impairment that interferes with participation in swallowing maneuvers.
Unable to undergo an MRI due to claustrophobia or presence of electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implant (including cardiac pacemaker), intracerebral vascular clips or any other electrically sensitive support system, metal in any part of the body, including metallic injury to eye, or pregnancy).
History of seizures or unexplained episodes of loss of consciousness.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
High dose anodal tDCS	tDCS	High dose tDCS (2 milliamps twice daily) for 5 days will be administered concomitantly with swallowing exercises
Low dose anodal tDCS	tDCS	This arm will use a low dose of current administered via tDCS (2 milliamps once daily) for 5 days will be administered concomitantly with swallowing exercises
Sham Stimulation	tDCS	Twice daily swallowing exercises only

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To Assess Changes in Penetration and Aspiration	Scores will be measured before tDCS and after 5 days after completion of stimulation	This will be assessed using the Penetration and Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores, a validated 8 point ordinal scale that quantifies penetration and aspiration events observed during Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Evaluation. PAS ranges from 1 (best score) representing no aspiration or penetration to 8 (worst score) representing severe aspiration. An average PAS score will be computed based on 9 swallows for this outcome.
To Assess Safety of tDCS in Acute-subacute Stroke Phase: Number of Participants With Seizures in Each of the 3 Groups	During the 5 days of stimulation sessions	We will tabulate the number of participants who develop seizures in the High-dose anodal tDCS, Low-dose anodal tDCS and Sham stimulation groups.
To Assess Safety of tDCS in Acute-subacute Stroke Phase: Number of Deaths in Each of the 3 Groups Attributable to the Direct Effects of Stroke	During the 5 days of stimulation sessions	We will tabulate the number of deaths in High-dose tDCS, Low-dose tDCS and Sham stimulation groups, that are attributable to the direct effects of the qualifying stroke.
To Assess Safety of tDCS in Acute-subacute Stroke Phase: Number of Participants With Motor Deterioration in Each of the 3 Groups	During the 5 days of stimulation sessions	We will tabulate the number of participants with deterioration in their motor functions in the High-dose tDCS, Low-dose tDCS and Sham groups. Motor deterioration will be defined as an increase in the motor sub-item of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score by 2 or more points between each successive day of stimulation. The motor sub-item of the NIHSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 16 (worst possible score), with higher scores indicating a worse motor exam.
To Assess Safety of tDCS in Acute-subacute Stroke Phase: Number of Participants With Swallowing Deterioration in Each of the 3 Groups	Any change between day 1 and day 3 of stimulation session	We will tabulate the number of participants with swallowing deterioration in the High-dose tDCS, Low-dose tDCS and sham groups Swallowing deterioration will be defined as an increase in the score by 2 or more points in the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). FOIS provides a validated measure of diet level. FOIS is an ordinal scale ranging from 7 (normal diet) to 0 (no oral intake), with lower scores indicating a worse diet.
To Assess Safety of tDCS in Acute-subacute Stroke Phase: Number of Participants With Neurological Deterioration in Each of the 3 Groups	During the 5 days of stimulation sessions	We will tabulate the number of participants who develop neurological deterioration in the High-dose tDCS, Low-dose tDCS and Sham groups. Neurological deterioration will be defined as an increase in the total National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) Score by 4 or more points between each successive day. The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. NIHSS ranges from 0 (normal) to 42 (worst possible score). Higher scores mean worse neurological functions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To Assess and Compare Changes in Dietary Intake in Each of the Three Groups	At study onset and after 1 month	The durability of any observed effects of the intervention on dietary status will be estimated by changes in Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) score. FOIS is an ordinal scale ranging from 1 (worst) to 7 (normal oral diet) and provides a reliable measure of dietary intake. The change in FOIS scores across each group will be compared.
To Assess Changes in Physiological Measures of Pharyngeal Strength	Variables will be measured at baseline (before starting tDCS) and after 5 days after completion of stimulation	Examining effects of differing doses of anodal tDCS versus sham stimulation on Pharyngeal Constriction Ratio (PCR), derived from videofluoroscopic swallowing studies.PCR is a measure of the pharyngeal area visible in the lateral radiograph view at the point when a bolus is held in the oral cavity divided by the pharyngeal area at the point of maximum pharyngeal constriction during the swallow. A higher PCR indicates a weak swallow leading to increased food residue in the pharynx.
To Assess Changes in Physiological Measures of Laryngeal Excursion	Variables will be measured at baseline (before starting tDCS) and after 5 days after completion of stimulation	Examining effects of differing doses of anodal tDCS versus sham stimulation on measure of actual excursion of the larynx in centimeters from their resting point to maximal excursion, derived from videofluoroscopic swallowing studies.
To Assess Changes in Physiological Measures of Briskness of Swallow Onset	Variables will be measured at baseline (before starting tDCS) and after 5 days after completion of stimulation	Examining effects of differing doses of anodal tDCS versus sham stimulation on Pharyngeal Delay Time (PDT) , derived from videofluoroscopic swallowing studies. PDT is defined as the time in centiseconds that the bolus is present in the hypopharynx before the swallow is triggered. PDT is a temporal measure of the briskness of the swallow onset.
Change in PAS Scores as an Indicator of Dysphagia Recovery After Covariate Adjustment	At day 5 of study participation	We will examine the effects of the intervention in a linear model by using it as a predictor for dysphagia recovery along with other variables of interest \[age, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and Penetration and Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores\], with a change in PAS scores from baseline to day 5 of the intervention, as being the outcome of interest.