Clinical Performance of Glass Hybrid Restorations in the Treatment of Class III Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Esthetic properties
研究概览
简要总结
This is a double blinded, split mouth, randomized clinical study that evaluated the performance of a glass hybrid restorative material in class III lesions. The lesions will be restored with glass hybrid restorative (Equia Forte) or anterior composite resin (G-aenial Anterior). Restorations will be evaluated after 24 months according to FDI criteria and the data will be analyzed.
详细描述
The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the clinical performance of a glass-hybrid-restorative with an anterior composite resin (G-aenial Anterior) in class III lesions.
Participants who are 18 years of age or older and healthy, and who have applied to the Restorative Dentistry Department of Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry to receive treatment for class III lesions on their front teeth will be included in the study. After explaining the purpose and conditions of the study, they will be asked to sign an informed consent form. The gender, age, and tooth numbers of the participants to be treated will be recorded. 100 upper incisors of 50 patients will be treated, with attention paid to the balanced distribution of teeth in the right and left arches. The "split-mouth" model will be used in the study, with two teeth included in one mouth and each restorative material placed in one tooth. The restorative material to be placed on the teeth will be determined randomly. Before starting the restoration, papers with the names of both materials will be placed in envelopes, and then the assistant staff will be asked to randomly select one of the envelopes during the restoration stage to provide randomization.Data were will be analyzed with Chi- Square, Fisher's Exact Test, Mann U tests
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 50 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •The participant must be at least 18 years of age or older
- •The participant has at least two class III lesions and the lesions are in symmetrical teeth located in the right and left arch
- •The lesion covers at most 2/3 and at least 1/3 of the dentin
- •Participant voluntarily signing the informed consent form
- •The participant does not have a physical disability that may prevent them from coming to the control.
- •Absence of a periapical pathology in the involved tooth
排除标准
- •Having systemic disorders that may prevent the participant from regularly attending treatment and control appointments.
- •Having severe periodontal problems in the tooth planned to be treated
- •Absence of the opposite of the tooth and not participating in chewing
- •Lesions which is limited with the enamel tissue
- •Teeth with lesions that are too large to be restored
- •Patients with anterior malocclusion
- •Patients with parafunctional habits.
- •Mentally disabled patients.
结局指标
主要结局
Esthetic properties
时间窗: 2 years
Second outcome is esthetic properties. The secondary factor for determining the clinical performance of a restorative material is the Esthetic properties. Visual examination will be used for evaluating restorations according to FDI criteria by two experienced researchers at 1- week 6-, 12-, 18- and 24- months. The Esthetic properties are scored as 1- clinically excellent, 2-clinically good, 3-clinically sufficient/satisfactory, 4-clinically unsatisfactory 5-clinically poor (replacement necesessry). Clinically 1, 2 and 3 scores are clinical acceptable but 4 and 5 scores are designated as failure.
Functional properties
时间窗: 2 years
The primary factor for determining the clinical performance of a restorative material is the Functional properties. Visual tactile examination tools will be used for evaluating restorations according to FDI criteria by two experienced researchers at 1- week 6-, 12-, 18- and 24- months. The functional properties are scored as 1- clinically excellent, 2-clinically good, 3-clinically sufficient/satisfactory, 4-clinically unsatisfactory 5-clinically poor (replacement necesessry). Clinically 1, 2 and 3 scores are clinical acceptable but 4 and 5 scores are designated as failure.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Uzay Koc
Assoc. Prof.
Hacettepe University