MedPath

Effects of Enavogliflozin on Coronary Microvascular and Cardiac Function in Obesity

Phase 4
Recruiting
Conditions
Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT06782139
Lead Sponsor
Korea University Anam Hospital
Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to analyze the effects of enavogliflozin on heart function and coronary microvascular function in obese patients compared to a placebo, and to evaluate the improvement in cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in these patients.

Detailed Description

In recent years, the prevalence of obesity has increased, which acts as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Obesity is closely related to reduced microvascular function, increased insulin resistance, and elevated blood pressure, and it is particularly known to be a major cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and diastolic dysfunction. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) leads to angina, myocardial infarction, and heart failure, which are associated with increased mortality. CMD has recently gained more importance as one of the key mechanisms of HFpEF. However, CMD often shows poor response to standard treatments, and when not recognized by healthcare providers, it can result in poor outcomes due to a lack of appropriate treatment.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are drugs that inhibit glucose reabsorption by blocking SGLT2 in the proximal tubules of the kidneys, thereby lowering blood sugar. Initially developed as oral hypoglycemic agents, previous randomized controlled studies have shown that they also have significant beneficial effects on heart failure and cardiovascular diseases not only in diabetic patients but also in non-diabetic patients. Recent studies have also demonstrated the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with HFpEF. SGLT2 inhibitors reduce excessive sodium excretion through urine, which reduces fluid volume, lowers blood pressure, and decreases body weight, but the exact mechanism of their significant effects in cardiovascular diseases is still not fully understood. In particular, research on the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on microvascular function is still limited. Recently, a randomized controlled study involving 16 diabetic patients reported an increase in myocardial flow reserve after 4 weeks of dapagliflozin administration, while another study involving 90 high-risk cardiovascular diabetic patients showed no significant change in myocardial flow reserve at 13 weeks with empagliflozin. Regarding enavogliflozin, a recent animal study in pigs suggested that it could improve vascular function by intervening in coronary endothelial cell function.

This study hypothesized that enavogliflozin would improve microvascular abnormalities and enhance heart function and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in obesity-related cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the effects of enavogliflozin on heart function and microvascular function in obese patients compared to a placebo, and to evaluate the improvement in cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in these patients.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria

The following criteria must be met for inclusion in the study:

  1. Obesity or Abdominal Obesity:

    Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m², or Waist circumference: Male ≥ 90 cm, Female ≥ 85 cm.

  2. Diabetes:

Hemoglobin A1c ≥ 6.5%, or Fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL after 8 hours of fasting, or Currently on antidiabetic medication. Blood test results must be within 3 months prior to enrollment.

Other inclusion criteria:

Age between 20 and 79 years. Patients who have undergone coronary flow velocity reserve testing. For baseline echocardiography, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction will be evaluated structurally (LV dimension, LV mass index, LA size) and hemodynamically (Doppler data, left ventricular ejection fraction, strain data).

Exclusion Criteria
  1. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%
  2. History of coronary artery disease, or patients who have undergone coronary artery intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting.
  3. Patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease, including those with chest pain and positive stress test results (e.g., exercise treadmill test, dobutamine stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion imaging).
  4. Second-degree or higher atrioventricular block, symptomatic bradycardia, sick sinus syndrome, or Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
  5. Chronic kidney disease (GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²) or end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
  6. Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or primary pulmonary hypertension.
  7. Moderate or severe valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease, or patients with a history of open-heart surgery.
  8. Active cancer within the last 5 years, or patients currently receiving chemotherapy.
  9. Vasculitis associated with autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
  10. Patients who cannot undergo exercise testing, such as treadmill or bicycle ergometer testing.
  11. Use of any other SGLT2 inhibitors (e.g., dapagliflozin, empagliflozin) within the past 6 months, or a known allergy to these drugs.
  12. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  13. Women planning pregnancy during the study period (or within 24 weeks from the start of the study, including the 12-week observation period).
  14. Acute urinary tract infection at the time of enrollment.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PlaceboPlaceboThe placebo is provided by the pharmaceutical company in the form of a tablet that is identical in size, shape, taste, and odor to the active intervention medication.
EnavogliflozinEnavogliflozinThe medication is a soft, orange, bi-convex, triangular film-coated tablet, and it is administered once daily at a dose of 0.3 mg, regardless of meals.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Coronary microvascular functionFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

The changes in coronary flow velocity reserve at 12 weeks compared to baseline in the active drug/placebo groups

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cardiopulmonary exercise capacity (VO2peak, mL/min/kg)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

The changes in cardiopulmonary exercise capacity ((VO2peak, mL/min/kg) at 12 weeks compared to baseline in the active drug/placebo groups

Body weight (kg)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in body weight (kg) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Waist circumference (cm)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in waist circumference (cm) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Lipid profileFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in total cholesterol (mg/dL), triglycerides (mg/dL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Hemoglobin A1c (%)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in hemoglobin A1c (%) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

NT-proBNP (pg/mL)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in NT-proBNP (pg/mL) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Self-assessment of sarcopenia (score)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in self-assessment of sarcopenia (score) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

5-time chair rise test (sec)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in 5-time chair rise test (sec) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Body composition analysis - skeletal muscle mass indexFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in skeletal muscle mass index (kg/m2) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Body composition analysis - visceral fat areaFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in visceral fat area (cm2) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Echocardiographic findings - chamber size (mm)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in chamber size (mm) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Echocardiographic findings - ejection fraction (%)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in ejection fraction (%) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Echocardiographic findings - E/e'From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in E/e' at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Echocardiographic findings - global longitudinal strain (%)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Changes in global longitudinal strain (%) at 12 weeks compared to baseline

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Korea University Anam Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath