Comparison of insertion techniques of laryngeal mask airway : a randomised clinical trial
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Patients undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000005972
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Southwest Hospital,
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Mallampati scores more than 3. morbid obesity. respiratory tract pathology. limited mouth opening. Risk of regurgitation or aspiration (previous upper gastrointestinal tract surgery, known or aymptomatic hiatus hernia, esophageal reflux, peptic ulceration or not fasted)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method the overall success rate and complications of laryngeal mask intubation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie successful laryngeal mask airway insertion in elective surgery patients?
How does the JPRN-UMIN000005972 trial compare different LMA insertion techniques in terms of success rates and complications?
Are there biomarkers that predict optimal LMA insertion success in patients with specific airway anatomies?
What adverse events are associated with alternative LMA insertion methods, and how are they managed in clinical practice?
How do recent advancements in airway management devices compare to traditional LMA insertion techniques in elective surgeries?