MedPath

Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Apneal®, a Medical Device on Smartphone, for Sleep Apnea-hypopnea Syndrome Diagnosis.

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Sleep Apnea Syndromes
Interventions
Device: Apneal device
Registration Number
NCT06474143
Lead Sponsor
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the ability of the Apneal application in diagnosing sleep apnea in adult patients.

Participants will be asked to wear the Apneal device during their fulll-night sleep test (polysomnography, the gold standard for sleep apnea)

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
491
Inclusion Criteria
  • Individuals, men or women, aged over 18 and with no upper age limit;
  • Individuals for whom PSG is indicated as part of routine care, regardless of indication.
  • Individuals willing and able to comply with study requirements;
  • Individuals with a declared total sleep time of at least 6 hours, as recommended by AASM for PSG analysis.
  • Individuals affiliated to social security or beneficiary of such a scheme if applicable according to the local regulation ;
  • Voluntary individuals who have provided oral and written consent after being informed by the research investigator.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Individuals with active implantable medical devices (e.g. electronic heart implant, electrical neurophysiological stimulator...);
  • Individuals with mechanical heart valves;
  • Individuals with chest deformity preventing the phone to be correctly placed on the chest
  • Individuals with uncontrolled psychiatric conditions impairing their ability to fully consent to the study
  • Individuals suffering from epilepsy or an associated disorder;
  • Individuals suffering from a moderate to severe valvular disease;
  • Individuals under CPAP treatment during the participation.
  • Individuals suffering from a nervous system disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, other than periodic leg movement syndrome and restless leg syndrome.
  • Refusal to participate in the study at any time during the clinical investigation;
  • Individuals in period of exclusion from another protocol or currently participating in another interventional research study;
  • Individuals not able to understand and speak the official language of the research center;
  • Vulnerable individuals according to local legislation

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
EpxerimentalApneal devicePatients will wear the device during their polysomnographic recording
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Performance of Apneal® in categorizing SAHS severity using AHIthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The primary endpoint of this study is the performance of Apneal® in categorizing SAHS severity in four classes compared to PSG: normal (AHI \< 5), mild (5 ≤ AHI \< 15), moderate (15 ≤ AHI \< 30), and severe (AHI ≥ 30)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Correlation between AHI from Apneal and Berlin scorethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The endpoint requires to assess the performances of Apneal® in screening OSAS, against Berlin questionnaire. The ground truth and predicted severities will be established and compared for each included individual. The first step is to output a score for each of these methods :

* AHI for Apneal®

* Berlin score

The comparison of Apneal® with Berlin for sleep apnea screening will be conducted using ROC analysis.

Correlation between AHI from Apneal and AHI from PSGthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The endpoint requires to assess the performances of Apneal® against PSG first. The ground truth and predicted severities will be established and compared for each included individual.

Correlation between AHI from Apneal and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) scorethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The endpoint requires to assess the performances of Apneal® in screening OSAS, against Berlin questionnaire. The ground truth and predicted severities will be established and compared for each included individual. The first step is to output a score for each of these methods :

* AHI for Apneal®

* Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) score

The comparison of Apneal® with ESS for sleep apnea screening will be conducted using ROC analysis.

Correlation between AHI from Apneal and AHI from nocturnal polygraphythrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The endpoint requires to assess the performances of Apneal® against polygraphy channels derived from PSG first. The ground truth and predicted severities will be established and compared for each included individual.

Correlation between AHI from apneal and ODI from nocturnal oximetrythrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The endpoint requires to assess the performances of Apneal®, against nocturnal oximetry, . The ground truth and predicted severities will be established and compared for each included individual.

The comparison of Apneal® performance with nocturnal oximetry for sleep apnea screening will be conducted using ROC analysis.

Correlation between AHI from Apneal and STOPBANG scorethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The endpoint requires to assess the performances of Apneal® in screening OSAS, against NoSAS . The ground truth and predicted severities will be established and compared for each included individual. The first step is to output a score for each of these methods :

* AHI for Apneal®

* STOPBANG score

The comparison of Apneal® with STOPBANG for sleep apnea screening will be conducted using ROC analysis.

The segmentation of the night in snores and non-snores periodsthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

Segmentations of Apneal® and manual scoring of the recorded sound, by a sleep technologist in the centralized scoring center, will be compared.

Wake/night detectionthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The segmentation of the night as wake and sleep predicted by Apneal® and manually scored on PSG will be compared.

Correlation between AHI from Apneal and NoSAS scorethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The endpoint requires to assess the performances of Apneal® in screening OSAS, against NoSAS . The ground truth and predicted severities will be established and compared for each included individual. The first step is to output a score for each of these methods :

* AHI for Apneal®

* NoSAS score

The comparison of Apneal® with NoSAS for sleep apnea screening will be conducted using ROC analysis.

The classification of sleep epochs into three categories : wake, REM sleep and NREM sleep (N1, N2 or N3).through study completion, an average of 1 year

The ground truth (from PSG) and predicted (from Apneal®) sleep stages classification will be established and compared for each included individual after :

* the PSG and Apneal® data are recorded during the inclusion visit (sleep study)

* the PSG sleep stages are estimated by the scorer in the centralized center, following AASM guidelines

* the ground truth sleep stages are output from these estimations or the adjudication committee if there is a disagreement between the two first scorers.

* Apneal® sleep stages are predicted automatically by the Apneal® algorithm. Sleep stages from Apneal® and PSG are compared using accuracy of the binary classifications.

Heart ratethrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The heart rate predicted by Apneal®, compared with the heart rate derived from ECG on PSG.

Autonomic sleep fragmentationthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The autonomic sleep fragmentation index, which is the average amount of autonomic arousals per hour of sleep. It will be estimated by Apneal® and compared with the autonomic sleep fragmentation index derived from ECG on PSG.

Central apnea indexthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

amount of central apneas per hour of sleep. Apneal® will estimate this index, and it will be compared with the central apnea index measured on PSG.

Medicoeconomic studythrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The estimated relative difference between the number of visits, with and without Apneal® in the clinical pathway

Position detectionthrough study completion, an average of 1 year

The segmentation of the participant's position in 6 categories: supine, left, right, prone, sitting and standing. Segmentation of Apneal® and PSG will be compared. position on PSG will be manually scored, position on Apneal is predicted automatically by the Apneal® algorithm.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Centre du sommeil, hôpital Bichat

🇫🇷

Paris, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath