Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07207447
NCT07207447CompletedNot Applicable

Validity of the Non-union Scoring System in Management of Long Bone Fracture Non-union: A Prospective Study

Ain Shams University2 sites in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: February 10, 2022Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
60
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Radiological Fracture Union

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to apply Calori Non union Scoring System on long bone non-union cases and evaluate the results of treatment o f the patients according to the score.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to apply Calori Non union Scoring System on long bone non-union cases and evaluate the results of treatment o f the patients according to the score. The study will be on patients with lower limb long bone diaphyseal fracture non-union. All patients will be assessed preoperatively by Clinical Evaluation: History, general examination, local examination, radiological evaluation: Plain X-ray films showing joint above and joint below the non-union site, laboratory Investigations: CBC, ESR, CRP and HbA1c. For patient allocation, patients will be divided into four groups according to the NUSS score, with group one (0-25 points) who underwent improving the stability and re-fixation with different modalities such as exchange plate with longer plate, intramedullary nailing, exchange nailing with larger diameter, plating over nail or dynamization of intramedullary nail. Group two (26-50 points) underwent re-fixation in addition to biological stimulation such as bone grafting, either with plate and bone graft, plate over nail and graft, or with external fixation with LRS or Ilizarov and grafting in one stage or two stages. Group three (51-75 points) required more complex care with resection of the non-union and dealing with the defect with bone transport, either direct transport or staged with cement spacer and later bone transport, Masquelet technique or acute compression and lengthening with another osteotomy. Group four (76-100 points) underwent amputation with consideration of prosthesis. The patients will be followed up at regular intervals as regard radiological and clinical evaluation until full union is achieved or non-union is established. The assessment includes; clinical and functional assessment based on pain at the fracture site and recovery of the usual activities or work, and radiological assessment based on plain radiograph x-rays, CT scan if needed to assess union. Radiological union is considered based on the presence of bridging callus (3/4 of cortices) in both anteroposterior and lateral views.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Sex: both sexes.
  • Age: Above 18 years old.
  • Lesion: Tibial or femoral bone non-union.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Skeletal immaturity.
  • Any immunosuppressive drug therapy.
  • Autoimmune disease.
  • Neoplasia.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Radiological Fracture Union

Time Frame: According to each group ranging from 5 months in group 1, 7 in group 2 and up to 12 months in group 3

Radiological fracture union is considered based on the presence of bridging callus (3/4 of cortices) in both anteroposterior and lateral views in x rays.

Clinical Fracture Union

Time Frame: According to each group ranging from 4 months in group 1, 6 in group 2 and up to 11 months in group 3.

Clinical fracture union assessment is based on presence or absence of pain at the fracture site.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials