Personalized Care Pathways for Bowel Symptoms in Rectal Cancer patients_development of E-diary

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Rectal Cancer; LARS - Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
• Interventions: Diagnostic Test: bowel e-diary

• Registration Number: NCT06274190
• Lead Sponsor: KU Leuven

Brief Summary

Colorectal cancer is the 2nd and 3rd most common cancer in respectively women and men, of which about 40% is located in the rectum. The gold standard treatment for rectal cancer (RC) is a low anterior resection, combined with chemoradiotherapy. However, this treatment will negatively impact different aspects of bowel function and the patients' quality of life. These bowel symptoms often remain prevalent, even at 12 months after RC treatment. Most assessment tools are however not capable of capturing the full range or therapeutic-related evolution of these bowel symptoms. Consequently, the aim is to develop a validated bowel diary for diagnosing and evaluation of all bowel symptoms.

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer is the 2nd and 3rd most common cancer in women and men, respectively and represents approximately 13% of all new cancer diagnoses, with 40% of cases specifically situated in the rectum. The gold standard treatment for rectal cancer (RC) is a low anterior resection, combined with chemoradiotherapy. However, given the improved oncological results, functional outcomes, such as bowel symptoms, become more and more important. Approximately 60-90% of RC patients are affected with a wide range of new onset bowel symptoms (incontinence for flatus or feces (solid, liquid), frequent bowel movements, urgency, clustering of defecation and evacuation problems) immediately after rectal treatment. The combination of these specific bowel symptoms and their impact on quality of life (QoL) has been summarized in an international consensus definition and is referred to as the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS).

Major LARS has an important impact on QoL and has major health economic consequences. This is attributable to its high prevalence after RC treatment, the chronic nature of symptoms and the limited evidence of available therapeutic options. This context leads to repetitive medical consultations, additional technical examinations which are often not very useful and need for prolonged medical treatment (multiple drug regimens), with often limited therapeutic gain. Furthermore, there is a lack of a comprehensive scoring system to identify the different aspects of LARS, leading to inadequate diagnostics and follow-up of symptoms. Based on these considerations, there is a clear need for a comprehensive scoring system for identification of the different aspects of LARS and monitoring of therapeutic treatment.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2024-01-31
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-02-15
• Study First Posted: 2024-02-23
• Study Start: 2024-04-29
• Status Verified: 2025-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-03-27
• Last Update Posted: 2025-04-02
• Primary Completion: 2025-10
• Study Completion: 2026-03

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 118

Inclusion Criteria

• Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures.
• At least 18 years of age at the time of signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF).
• Proficient in reading, comprehending, and conversing in Dutch .
• Patients diagnosed with a rectal tumour based on a pathology report.

Exclusion Criteria

• The participant has undergone a different type of surgery, including a Hartmann procedure, abdominoperineal excision, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, or sigmoid resection.
• Experienced fecal incontinence prior to undergoing surgery.
• Are affected by neurological disorders affecting bowel function.
• Already underwent previous pelvic surgery, previous pelvic radiation or rectal surgery for non-cancer reasons.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Psychometric properties of e-diary	bowel e-diary	To evaluate the validity of the e-diary, encompassing test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness, participants will be instructed to use the e-diary for two separate 7-day periods.
Usability of e-diary	bowel e-diary	The participants will be asked to use the newly developed electronic bowel diary for 7 consecutive days. To evaluate the usability of the e-diary, a group of 10 patients will participate in the assessment using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Furthermore we will have conversations with these patients regarding the use of the application: complexity, need for additional support, coherence of the application, user-friendliness, and the need for prior knowledge.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Selection of items for the newly developed bowel diary	12 months	The selection of items for a comprehensive bowel diary in patients with rectal cancer is based on a literature review, a patient focus group and an international Delphi survey. The patient focus group is recorded using an audio and video recording. This recording is transcribed verbatim by the researcher into a Word document. The transcription will be analyzed using NVIVO 9 software. In this Delphi survey, a multidisciplinary group of experts will score each item of the long list on a 1-9-point Likert scale from 'Not relevant' (1) to 'Essential' (9) for inclusion in the bowel diary. Finally, a patient consultation meeting and a consensus meeting will be held for the participants who completed the Delphi survey.
Assessment of content validity of the newly developed bowel diary in a post-Delphi patient focus group consisting of 8-12 participants	12 months	Content validation of the newly developed bowel diary will be tested during interview in the post-Delphi patient focus group. This focus group is recorded using an audio and video recording. This recording are transcribed verbatim by the researcher into a Word document. The transcription will be analyzed using NVIVO 9 software.
The usability of the newly developed e-diary, assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS) in patients after rectal surgery for rectal cancer	12 months	The participants will be asked to use a newly developed electronic bowel diary for 7 consecutive days. This bowel diary will be available on the smartphone in the form of an application. After 7 days, the usability of this e-diary will be assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS). The SUS is a questionnaire consisting of 10 items, utilizing a 5-point Likert scale to measure users' perceived satisfaction with the system. It includes two subscales focusing on usability and learnability. Scores on the SUS range from 0 to 100, with no direct correlation to percentiles (i.e., a score of 60 does not signify a usability level of 60%). Instead, a score of 70 points or higher is commonly employed as an initial threshold indicating acceptable usability. This benchmark is derived from the overall mean of more than 200 studies covering various systems and products.
The usability of the newly developed e-diary will be evaluated through conversations with patients who have undergone rectal surgery for rectal cancer, after these patients have used the e-diary for seven consecutive days	12 months	Participants will be instructed to use a newly developed electronic bowel diary via a smartphone app for seven consecutive days. The research will then conduct conversations with the participants covering aspects such as complexity, the need for additional support, application coherence, user-friendliness, pre-existing knowledge requirements, and suggestions for improvement. Audio and video recordings of these conversations will be transferred to the researcher's computer and subsequently transcribed into a Word document. The transcriptions will be analyzed using NVIVO 9 software.
Construct validity of the newly developed bowel e-diary: Known groups method	12 months	Patients will be divided into two groups based on their LARS score: no/minor LARS and major LARS. Over a 7-day period, patients will be asked to complete the bowel diary, which will then be examined to determine if there is a meaningful difference between the two groups. The Mann-Whitney U-test will be used to assess whether the difference is significant, and the C-index will be calculated to evaluate how well the test distinguishes between the groups. A C-index of 0.65 or higher would indicate that the test is effective at differentiating between the groups.
Construct validity of the newly developed bowel e-diary: Convergent and divergent validity	12 months	The bowel diary will be completed by patients over a 7-day period, while the questionnaires (such as LARS, MSKCC-BFI, COREFO, PAC-SYM, QLQ-C30) will be filled out on day 7.; The correlation between the bowel diary and the questionnaires (such as LARS, MSKCC-BFI, COREFO, PAC-SYM, QLQ-C30) will be calculated. The correlation will be performed across the entire set of questionnaires and bowel diary items, while pairwise correlations at the subscale level will analyze the relationship between related factors.
Test-retest reliability of the newly developed bowel e-diary	12 months	To investigate the test-retest reliability of the newly developed bowel e-diary, patients will have to fill out the bowel diary application twice, each time for a continuous period of 7 days, during a period when the disorder and treatment do not change (i.e., after the end of adjuvant treatment and/or after closure of an eventual temporary postoperative ileostomy).
Responsiveness of the newly developed bowel e-diary in patients after rectal surgery for rectal cancer. The newly validated e-diary is the primary outcome.	12 months	To evaluate the responsiveness of the new bowel diary, patients will complete the diary for 14 consecutive days. The first 7 days (day 1-7) will be compared with the following 7 days (day 7-14). Internal responsiveness will be calculated using the Standardized Response Mean (SRM) for the bowel diary. External responsiveness will be assessed by calculating the SRM for both the bowel diary and the LARS score and MSKCC-BFI questionnaires.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

UZ Leuven; 🇧🇪 Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium