MedPath

Trial Comparing Proximal Tibia and Proximal Humerus Infusion Rates Using the NIO Intraosseous Device

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Intraosseous Access
Resuscitation
Interventions
Device: NIO
Registration Number
NCT02700867
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Warsaw
Brief Summary

The investigators sought to compare the intraosseous access success rates of the proximal tibia and the proximal humerus using new Intraosseous access device "NIO" in an adult cadaver model during simulated resuscitation.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
84
Inclusion Criteria
  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • paramedics
  • without previous experience in intraosseous devices
Exclusion Criteria
  • not meet the above criteria

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Proximal humerusNIOAssumption of intraosseous access into the proximal humerus. Simulation of continous resuscitation was carried out using a system of chest compression LifeLine ARM.
Proximal tibiaNIOAssumption of intraosseous access into the proximal tibia. Simulation of continous resuscitation was carried out using a system of chest compression LifeLine ARM.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Success rate1 day

Success rate of IO cannulation was defined as successful administration of infusion solutions via the performed IO access. Failure was defined as extravasation or unsuccessful (first) effort of IO insertion.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time of IO insertion1 day

Procedure time was defined as the duration of picking up the prepared set of IO device from the shelf, preparation of the access set and patients' insertion site including disinfection and draping, insertion procedure of the cannula itself, assembling of the access set and first successful administration of drugs or infusion solutions through the newly established vascular access. The time taken for each infusion attempt was measured offline while reviewing procedures by videotape, and subsequently entered into a computer spreadsheet. Times were measured in seconds.

Ease-of-use1 day

ease-of-use of the NIO in tibia and humerus using a five-point Likert Scale ("the device is easy to use"; 1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neither agree nor disagree, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree).

first location1 day

Participants were asked to record their "first location access" tibia or humerus

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Emergency Medicine

🇵🇱

Warsaw, Masovia, Poland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath