Impact of Socio-aesthetic Care in the Quality of Life of Patients Treated for Lymphoma During and After Hospitalization

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Lymphoma
• Interventions: Procedure: socio-aesthetic care

• Registration Number: NCT02072655
• Lead Sponsor: University Hospital, Angers

Brief Summary

In the early 2000s , professional and patient organizations are mobilizing to highlight the psychosocial impact of cancer disease , not only during but also after the acute phase.

In 2003, the government launched the Cancer Plan I reinforced in December 2011 by the Cancer Plan II whose objectives include : " Develop a personalized care taking into account the pain and psychological and social support " and " increase opportunities for patients to benefit from supportive care "and" promote the professional integration .

This study aims to show that beyond the immediate benefits of the social aesthetic cares in hospital (direct soothing, improving the quality of the skin injured by chemotherapy , feeling of escape ... ), these treatments can also affect quality of life for patients during and after hospitalization. They also may have an impact on the maintenance of social and / or professional satisfactory throughout the planned chemotherapy aplastic period .

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2014-01
• Study First Submitted: 2014-02-20
• Study First Submitted QC: 2014-02-24
• Study First Posted: 2014-02-26
• Primary Completion: 2016-01
• Study Completion: 2016-01
• Status Verified: 2016-06
• Last Update Submitted: 2016-06-15
• Last Update Posted: 2016-06-16

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 40

Inclusion Criteria

• 18 to 65 years old
• Hospitalized in the Hematology care unit in UH Angers
• Initial Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma
• Without previous socio-aesthetic care.

Exclusion Criteria

• Age <18 years old.
• Patient protected by the law.
• Patient at end of life.
• Patient unable to respond to the questionnaire.
• Previous Socio aesthetic care.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
with socio-aesthetic cares	socio-aesthetic care	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Quality of life score	Change form baseline in Quality of life score at an average of 5 months (4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy).	* For patients in control group, arbitrarily during their fifth cycle of chemotherapy; * For patients in interventional group during the course of chemotherapy after the third socio-aesthetic care, or at the latest, at the sixth treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Social life assessment	Change form baseline in social life assessment score at an average of 5 months (4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy).
Coopersmith Self-esteem inventory	Change form baseline in Coopersmith Self-esteem inventory score at an average of 5 months (4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy).
Body Image Scale assessment	Change form baseline in body image scale assessment score at an average of 5 months (4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hematology Care Unit - UH Angers; 🇫🇷 Angers, France