Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01866085
NCT01866085
Unknown
Not Applicable

Randomised Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of AdVance® vs ARGUS® Sling Procedure in Male With Post Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence

Jewish General Hospital1 site in 1 country128 target enrollmentJune 2012

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Stress Urinary Incontinence
Sponsor
Jewish General Hospital
Enrollment
128
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Patient satisfaction using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score and assess change in 24-hour pad weight .
Last Updated
12 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The study is designed to assess efficacy and subject satisfaction of two sling devices: Advance and Argus, in male patients with stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2012
End Date
June 2015
Last Updated
12 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Male

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Jacques Corcos

MD. Professor of Urology, McGill University

Jewish General Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The subject is male
  • The subject is at least 18 years of age
  • The subject has an estimated life expectancy of more than 5 years
  • The subject has confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI) through medical history, urodynamics, and/or physical exam for at least 6 months
  • The subject has intrinsic sphincter deficiency due to one of the following:
  • post-TURP, simple open prostatectomy, radical prostatectomy completed at least 6 months prior to implantation date
  • Positive Cough Stress Test (CST):
  • Positive 24-hours Pad Test (PT):
  • A positive PT is confirmed with leakage of \>8.O g/24h and \< 400 g
  • The subject has completed urodynamics, uroflow, post-void residual, and cystoscopy as per the protocol within 6 months prior to implant

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects who meet any of the following criteria are excluded from entry into the study
  • The subject is unable or unwilling to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and/or comply with all follow-up requirements according to the study protocol
  • The subject has an active urogenital infection or active skin infection in region of surgery
  • The subject has serious bleeding disorders
  • The subject has incontinence due to neurogenic causes defined as multiple sclerosis, spinal cord/brain injury, CVA, detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia, Parkinson's disease, or similar conditions
  • The subject had a previous implant to treat stress urinary incontinence
  • The subject has undergone radiation, cryosurgery, or brachy therapy to treat prostate or other pelvic cancer within 6 months
  • The subject is likely to undergo radiation therapy within the next 6 months
  • The subject has active urethral or bladder neck stricture disease, requiring continued treatment
  • The subject has urge predominant incontinence

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Patient satisfaction using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score and assess change in 24-hour pad weight .

Time Frame: 12 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Assess change in subject satisfaction using questionnaires: ICIQ, UCLA-RAND Incontinence Index.(12 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials