NCT01866085
Unknown
Not Applicable
Randomised Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of AdVance® vs ARGUS® Sling Procedure in Male With Post Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence
ConditionsStress Urinary Incontinence
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence
- Sponsor
- Jewish General Hospital
- Enrollment
- 128
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Patient satisfaction using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score and assess change in 24-hour pad weight .
- Last Updated
- 12 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The study is designed to assess efficacy and subject satisfaction of two sling devices: Advance and Argus, in male patients with stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy.
Investigators
Jacques Corcos
MD. Professor of Urology, McGill University
Jewish General Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •The subject is male
- •The subject is at least 18 years of age
- •The subject has an estimated life expectancy of more than 5 years
- •The subject has confirmed stress urinary incontinence (SUI) through medical history, urodynamics, and/or physical exam for at least 6 months
- •The subject has intrinsic sphincter deficiency due to one of the following:
- •post-TURP, simple open prostatectomy, radical prostatectomy completed at least 6 months prior to implantation date
- •Positive Cough Stress Test (CST):
- •Positive 24-hours Pad Test (PT):
- •A positive PT is confirmed with leakage of \>8.O g/24h and \< 400 g
- •The subject has completed urodynamics, uroflow, post-void residual, and cystoscopy as per the protocol within 6 months prior to implant
Exclusion Criteria
- •Subjects who meet any of the following criteria are excluded from entry into the study
- •The subject is unable or unwilling to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and/or comply with all follow-up requirements according to the study protocol
- •The subject has an active urogenital infection or active skin infection in region of surgery
- •The subject has serious bleeding disorders
- •The subject has incontinence due to neurogenic causes defined as multiple sclerosis, spinal cord/brain injury, CVA, detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia, Parkinson's disease, or similar conditions
- •The subject had a previous implant to treat stress urinary incontinence
- •The subject has undergone radiation, cryosurgery, or brachy therapy to treat prostate or other pelvic cancer within 6 months
- •The subject is likely to undergo radiation therapy within the next 6 months
- •The subject has active urethral or bladder neck stricture disease, requiring continued treatment
- •The subject has urge predominant incontinence
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Patient satisfaction using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score and assess change in 24-hour pad weight .
Time Frame: 12 months
Secondary Outcomes
- Assess change in subject satisfaction using questionnaires: ICIQ, UCLA-RAND Incontinence Index.(12 months)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison Of A Novel Sling With A Traditional Abduction Sling After Shoulder SurgeryRotator Cuff TearsOsteo Arthritis ShouldersNCT05274737Orthopedic Institute, Sioux Falls, SD40
Completed
Not Applicable
Sling and Swing Positions to Pregnant WomenLaborParturitionDeliveryNCT05708482Ankara City Hospital Bilkent70
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing Buzzy Device With Emla Cream in Needle Related PainProcedural PainNCT05354739Hamad Medical Corporation300
Completed
Not Applicable
Adjuvant Therapy for Intrauterine Adhesions Between Two GroupsAsherman SyndromeNCT02867202Wenzhou Medical University171
Recruiting
Not Applicable
The Apollo Device in Systemic Sclerosis for the Management of fatiguE, Raynaud Phenomenon and qualiTy of LifeNCT06675344Robyn T. Domsic, MD, MPH160