MedPath

Understanding Experiences of People With Spinal Cord Injury Undergoing Activity-based Rehabilitation

Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Spinal Cord Injuries
Interventions
Behavioral: Activity based rehabilitation
Registration Number
NCT04000256
Lead Sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University
Brief Summary

Incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) makes up half of all the newly admitted patients. For these individuals, the use of their upper limbs is critical for managing daily activities and self-care and impacts their quality of life. For home-based monitored rehabilitation, also called telerehabilitation, there are various rehabilitation equipment that are used. No studies have systematically gathered information regarding the perceptions of individuals with SCI regarding these equipment, training, and feasibility within the home. Further, their perceptions of the usability of high vs low end equipment is also not explored. In this study, investigators plan to gather survey and interview data from individuals with SCI regarding their experience with using rehabilitation equipment that uses games, muscle stimulation, and object manipulation. This study will inform the development of a tele-rehabilitation intervention in the future.

Detailed Description

Incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) makes up half of all the newly admitted patients. The overall prognosis for walking is better than the upper limb recovery in incomplete tetraplegia. Upper limb deficits result in difficulty in managing daily activities and self-care and impacts quality of life. Rehabilitation of the upper limb involves high intensity repetitive activities that are directed to a specific task. The demands of these programs can be up to 5 hours of therapy, 5 days a week for 12 weeks. Home-based therapies augmented by tele-rehabilitation presents a more realistic alternative to clinic-based application of these programs due to transportation and time commitment. However, engaging and motivating therapy options are needed for home to enhance client outcomes and improve compliance. Some of the latest equipment provides this capability and engages the patient using games for training. However, high equipment cost limits its widespread use.

In this study, we will engage individuals with cervical SCI in a 4-week (8 visit) evaluation of a variety of training protocols to gather information on their perceptions regarding motivation, engagement, and challenge it offers; its ability to address limitations they experience; and its feasibility within the home.

The long-term goal of this National Institute of Disability Independent Living and Rehabilitation (NIDILRR) funded Spinal Cord Injury Model System (SCIMS) project is to develop an engaging and evidence-informed intervention for home-based upper limb activity-based rehabilitation in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). A review of literature was recently conducted by the research team to get a scope of the evidence related to current activity-based therapies and the equipment used to deliver these programs. There is insufficient information about the value of high-end equipment involving games relative to lower cost alternatives, or the perceptions of clients regarding the use of various technologies related to motivation, engagement, appropriate level of difficulty and feasibility within the home. This lab-based study aims to understand the experiences related to rehabilitation training and high and low end equipment for upper limb activity-based rehabilitation in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Motor incomplete cervical SCI, neurologic levels C1-C7
  2. Atleast one arm with active shoulder flexion (reach with gravity eliminated) and atleast one grasp pattern/able to move fingers
  3. At least 6 months post injury
  4. At least one arm with greater than 50% normal passive range of motion in all upper limb joints, excluding the interphalangeal joints of the fingers
  5. Medically stable with no contraindications to the activities or to sitting
  6. 18 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Uncontrolled pain in the upper limbs
  2. Upper extremity amputations
  3. Unable to commit to at least 3 visits
  4. Surgical procedures (e.g., tendon transfers) or orthopedic trauma (e.g., fracture) within the past 3 months
  5. Other neurological conditions
  6. Mechanical Ventilation

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Spinal Cord InjuryActivity based rehabilitationThe data during the first visit involves questionnaires, performance and observational measures for baseline evaluation. The 2nd to 8th visit involves feedback survey and interview data collection based on experiences of participants undergoing activity-based training using upper extremity rehabilitation equipment.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
10-item questionnaireWeek 4

Quantitative feedback using a 10-question survey regarding experiences with the rehabilitation training and equipment for feasibility, motivation, engagement and difficulty.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Qualitative interviewWeek 2

Interview to explore further the experiences with rehabilitation training and equipment.

10-item questionnaireWeek 2

Quantitative feedback using a 10-question survey regarding experiences with the rehabilitation training and equipment for feasibility, motivation, engagement and difficulty.

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Chapman University

🇺🇸

Orange, California, United States

Thomas Jefferson University

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath