Home-Based Assessment for Alzheimer Disease Prevention
- Conditions
- Mild Cognitive ImpairmentAlzheimer's Disease
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Mail and Live PhoneBehavioral: Interactive Voice Response (IVR)Behavioral: Traditional Evaluation InstrumentsBehavioral: Home-based Computer Kiosk
- Registration Number
- NCT00546767
- Lead Sponsor
- Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS)
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate three methods of performing home-based assessments in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) prevention trials. The initial in-person assessment will be done in the clinic or at home.
- Detailed Description
There is an unmet need for effective, efficient, and economical methods for conducting AD prevention trials. Traditional in-person visits to clinical assessment sites are time consuming and costly and may exclude some people from participation, such as those who are older, or are less mobile or with significant medical illnesses. These may be the people who are at greatest risk for cognitive decline, and also may be without financial resources for services such as transportation to a study site. Prevention trials require long observation periods and these same issues of health, resources, and transportation may cause significant drop out. These obstacles increase expense of clinical trials which require large sample sizes, costly clinical staff and long observation periods. Thus, home-based assessments may lead to more representative recruitment of those most at risk for decline, as well as better retention and reduced study costs.
This is a randomized study of 600 participants, comparing three methods of test administration and data collection. Each enrolled participant will have an In-person (Standard) assessment (in the clinic or at home) prior to baseline.
Participants will be classified as either normal or MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment) and randomly assigned to an assessment method and to a frequency of assessment. Cognitive performance, self-rated cognitive complaint, functioning in daily life, affective symptoms, global change, quality of life and resource use will all be assessed in each method at each visit. The total time for the at-home assessments will be approximately 45 minutes. In addition, all participants will be provided a multi-vitamin to be taken twice a day, and a measure of medication adherence will be collected for each assessment method.
Changes in certain cognitive measures may "trigger" an in-person assessment, in which participants may change from a categorization of normal or amnestic MCI, to non-amnestic MCI, impaired not MCI, or dementia (i.e., specifically Alzheimer's Disease or another dementia). We estimate that 12% of the study population will trigger over the 4 years of the study and will progress to a more impaired diagnostic category. In addition, a random sample of non-triggered cases (25%) will be selected for an in-person re-assessment during the 4 years of the protocol as a comparison for the trigger group. At the end of the 4-year study period all participants will undergo an in-person evaluation.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 640
- Age 75 and older
- Willing to sign consent
- Willing to take multi-vitamins provided by the study
- Minimal computer skills or willingness to learn (as demonstrated by completion during screening of a demonstration module for each arm)
- English fluency
- MMSE greater than 26
- Able to answer and dial a telephone
- Able to complete the in-person assessment
- Able to complete the computerized assessment including adequate speech, hearing and vision
- Independently living adults, defined as living in a setting in which the participant can ensure access to the resources for study procedures
- Participation of a study partner is desirable and encouraged, but not required
- Dementia
- Use of prescription cognitive-enhancing drugs at entry (e.g. Aricept, Razadyne, Exelon, Namenda)
- Intent to continue use of own multi-vitamins (for the duration of the study participants must agree to take only study-distributed multi-vitamins)
- History or presence of major psychiatric, neurological or neurodegenerative conditions associated with significant cognitive impairment such as major stroke, Parkinson's disease, Multiple Sclerosis or Huntington's disease. Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) is acceptable if over 6 months ago
- Medical conditions associated with life expectancy of less than 5 years
- Transient domicile interfering with ability to collect study-related data
- Current participation in a clinical trial involving Central Nervous System (CNS) medications or cognitive testing that would interfere with the current protocol (participation in Uniform Data Set (UDS) assessments by an ADC is permitted)
- Cohabitation with another participant in this particular study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Mail and Live Phone Mail and Live Phone - IVR Interactive Voice Response (IVR) - Traditional Traditional Evaluation Instruments - Computer Kiosk Home-based Computer Kiosk -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of change in domains of assessment 4 years Transition from cognitive health to impairment 4 years Feasibility Data -- the number of subjects recruited, screened, enrolled, and retained 4 years Method-Specific Adherence, including medication adherence 4 years Efficiency Data -- staff time required to successfully complete data collection Each experimental visit
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Safety Assessments: symptom checklist and adverse event checklist 4 years Research blood samples 4 years
Trial Locations
- Locations (28)
University of California-San Diego ADRC/Neurosciences
🇺🇸La Jolla, California, United States
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Neurology
🇺🇸Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University of Kentucky Sanders-Brown Center on Aging
🇺🇸Lexington, Kentucky, United States
New York University Aging and Dementia Research Center
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Sun Health Reseach Institute
🇺🇸Sun City, Arizona, United States
Wien Center
🇺🇸Miami Beach, Florida, United States
Georgetown University
🇺🇸Washington, District of Columbia, United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Indiana University
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of South Florida, Suncoast Alzheimer's & Gerontology Center
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of California, Irvine Institute for Brain Aging and Dementia
🇺🇸Irvine, California, United States
University of California, Davis
🇺🇸Martinez, California, United States
Northwestern University Cognitive Neurology & Alzheimer's Disease
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Johns Hopkins University
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Clinical and Research Program
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Nevada School of Medicine
🇺🇸Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Neurological Care of CNY
🇺🇸Syracuse, New York, United States
Case Western Reserve University
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
The Ohio State University
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Pennsylvania Geriatrics
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Utah Center for Alzheimer's Care
🇺🇸Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Stanford University / PAIRE
🇺🇸Palo Alto, California, United States
Yale University Alzheimer's Disease Research Unit
🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Wake Forest University Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
🇺🇸Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
University of Michigan Psychiatry - Neuropsychology
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States