跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05785858
NCT05785858招募中不适用

FLUME Catheter Comfort Study

The Flume Catheter Company Ltd1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 41 人开始时间: 2023年6月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
41
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in patient reported outcomes--Total Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score Short Form

研究概览

简要总结

The Flume catheter is a commercially available (FDA 510(k) cleared) urethral catheter with an innovative catheter design. The traditional Foley catheter design includes a protruding tip with drainage holes. The protruding tip may contribute to patient discomfort, pain and bladder spasms. The Flume catheter is designed such that the balloon envelops the tip on inflation, thus eliminating the protruding catheter tip, while the drainage holes are inset low in the balloon, providing protection to the bladder lining. Based on the change in design, the hypothesis of this observational cohort study is the Flume catheter will have better patient comfort scores (using validated patient reported outcomes measures) when compared to a traditional catheter.

详细描述

Background:

Urethral catheters function to drain the urinary bladder when medically indicated or when individuals are unable to empty their bladder by other means. This potential benefit of urinary drainage is balanced by substantial risks of the presence of a urinary catheter in the bladder. While much of the current literature focuses on Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI), patients experience substantial pain and discomfort as well. For example, in a cohort of 2000 participants, 50% reported pain or discomfort from the catheter, 20% experienced bladder spasms, and 40% experienced restricted activity1. These non-infectious complications create a substantial burden and decrement in quality of life when a catheter is required.

Rationale:

The Flume catheter is a commercially available catheter (FDA 510(k) cleared) with an innovative catheter design (figure 2). The traditional Foley catheter design includes a protruding tip with drainage holes, which clinically creates edema and disruption of the urothelial lining of the bladder. This protruding tip may also contribute to patient discomfort, pain, and bladder spasms. The Flume catheter is designed such that the balloon envelops the tip on inflation, thus eliminating the protruding catheter tip, while the drainage holes are inset low in the balloon, providing protection to the bladder lining. Based on this change in design, it is plausible that patients may experience less irritation of the urinary bladder, with a concomitant decrease in pain, discomfort, and bladder spasms. The study described herein seeks to compare patient comfort with a traditional catheter vs a Flume catheter.

Flume Catheter Comfort Study is a prospective, observational cohort study comparing patient-reported measures of comfort between the innovative Flume catheter design and the traditional catheter typically used by study participants. Only chronic catheter participants who receive catheter exchanges every 30 days are eligible to participate. As such, a pre-post study design (baseline and 30 day follow up) will allow for individual patients to act as their own control group pre- and post-Flume catheter insertion.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Document informed consent
  • Age ≥ 18 years at time of study entry
  • Indwelling urethral catheter use for at least the 3 months prior to study enrollment.
  • Able to read, write, and speak English

排除标准

  • Indwelling Foley catheter user for shorter than 3 months
  • Treatment for a urinary tract infection within 30 days prior to insertion of the Flume catheter, or reporting signs or symptoms of urinary tract infection at the time of catheter change, in the opinion of the treating clinician or site principal investigator.
  • Unable to read/write English at a 6th grade level
  • Neurologic diagnoses which could decrease/impair bladder sensation (e.g., spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis)
  • History of bladder augmentation or urinary diversion
  • Existing catheter related genital adverse effects (e.g., meatal erosion)
  • Current use of indwelling catheter larger than 18 Fr in size
  • Otherwise unable to participate in or complete study procedures, in the opinion of the principal investigator.

结局指标

主要结局

Change in patient reported outcomes--Total Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score Short Form

时间窗: Baseline and 30 day follow-up

Patient reported outcomes will be collected and compared at two time points using the validated Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score short form. Scores for the Total Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score Short Form can range from 0-28, with 0 being the best and 28 being the worst.

次要结局

  • Change in patient reported outcomes--Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score Short Form quality of life domains(Baseline and 30 day follow-up)
  • Change in patient reported outcomes--Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score Short Form incontinence domains(Baseline and 30 day follow-up)
  • Change in patient reported outcomes--applicable Genitourinary pain index instrument questions(Baseline and 30 day follow-up)

研究者

发起方
The Flume Catheter Company Ltd
申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验