跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01883037
NCT01883037已完成不适用

To Compare the Clinical Accuracy of Glucose Measurement During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Using Two Methods: i) Laboratory Standard Technique, ii) HemoCue Glucose 201 RT System

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2013年6月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
70
试验地点
1
主要终点
Does HemoCue Glucose 201 RT provide lab-quality results in the analysis of glucose values during oral glucose tolerance tests?

研究概览

简要总结

There are very few studies comparing the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of HemoCue glucose 201 RT system with the laboratory gold standard.

The incidence of cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD) has risen significantly as patients' survival improves. Around 30% of all cystic fibrosis (CF) adult patients have CFRD. Early diagnosis of CFRD is important to slow the deterioration of lung function and nutritional status, both of which increase mortality.

The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the accepted method for detecting CFRD and the Cystic Fibrosis Trust guidelines recommend that patients with CF over the age of twelve years should be screened annually.

The World Health Organisation has pointed out that due to the absence of a more specific biological marker to define diabetes, plasma glucose estimation remains the basis of diagnostic criteria. WHO recommends that venous plasma glucose should be the standard method for measuring and reporting glucose concentration in blood. However, it has also recognised that there is a widespread use of capillary sampling. Although fasting values for venous and capillary plasma glucose are the same, in the nonfasting state capillary samples will give higher results than venous samples, and glucose values require conversion which can be problematic.

HemoCue Glucose 201 RT (HGS 201 RT) analyzer with plasma conversion provides laboratory quality test results at the point of care for the diagnosis, screening and monitoring of diabetes mellitus. The analyzer is easy to use and the system can be operated by nonlaboratory personnel, also the results can be presented immediately, leading to significant time and resource saving. The patient also benefits from having the result immediately instead of waiting for several hours. With immediate result, the doctor and health care professionals can provide education, support and reassurance, and implement care plans, if appropriate, at the earliest opportunity.

The aim of the study is to compare the clinical accuracy of HemoCue Glucose 201 RT with the laboratory standard method in the analysis of blood glucose concentration during oral glucose tolerance test.

详细描述

All CF patients attending annual review who require an OGTT will have a venous and a capillary blood sample taken simultaneously before (fasting = 0 min) and 2 hours (post glucose load = 120 min) after the administration of 75 grams Glucose solution orally.

The capillary sample will be analysed immediately using HGS 201 RT. The venous sample will be collected in a Fluoride Oxalate tube (WHO guideline) and sent to the Trust's laboratory for analysis as per usual practice.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
16 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • The first 70 consecutive suitable consenting adult CF patients, who are 16 years of age and over, attending annual review at the Royal Brompton Hospital from June 2013 to March 2014, are eligible for the study

排除标准

  • Patients with an existing diagnosis of CFRD are exclude.

结局指标

主要结局

Does HemoCue Glucose 201 RT provide lab-quality results in the analysis of glucose values during oral glucose tolerance tests?

时间窗: One year

The glucose value from the HemoCue Glucose 201 RT will be compared with the Trust Laboratory value. The sensitivity, specificity and clinical significance will be calculated.

次要结局

  • Is HemoCue Glucose 201 RT method cost saving relative to the traditional laboratory method for analysing glucose values taken during oral glucose tolerance tests?(One year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验