MedPath

A Prospective Comparative Study of Induction of Labor With a Cervical Ripening Double Balloon vs Foley Catheter

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Endometritis
Induction of Labor
Cesarean
Registration Number
NCT00501033
Lead Sponsor
Western Galilee Hospital-Nahariya
Brief Summary

Hypothesis: The induction of labor in patients with unfavorable Bishop score is a challenging obstetrical process, and may be influenced or complicated by the cervical ripening method used. We will conduct a comparative study of the foley catheter vs the cervical ripening double balloon (Cook medical, GPN: G48149). We will compare the failure rates, cesarean section rate, infections and postpartum complications, especially endometritis.

Detailed Description

We will conduct a comparative study of the foley catheter vs the cervical ripening double balloon (Cook medical, GPN: G48149). We will compare the failure rates, cesarean section rate, infections and postpartum complications, especially endometritis. The study will include 200 parturients, 100 primiparous and 100 multiparous women. We will randomize each group to induction with the foley catheter or the cervical ripening double balloon. We will compare the failure rates, cesarean section rate, infectious and other postpartum complications, especially endometritis.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • Term pregnancy
  • Parturients candidates for mechanical induction of labor
Exclusion Criteria
  • Suspected amnionitis
  • Vaginal discharge
  • Pre induction pyrexia
  • Immunocompromised parturients

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Success of labor inductionPostpartum period
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cesarean section rateDelivery
Postpartum endometritis rateThe postpartum period

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Western Galilee Hospital

🇮🇱

Nahariya, Israel

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath