跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04202081
NCT04202081已完成不适用

Voices From the Black Community: Beliefs and Attitudes on Participating in Research Studies for Chronic Hepatitis C

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2019年2月21日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
200
试验地点
1
主要终点
Overall Willingness to Participate (WTP) Mean Score

研究概览

简要总结

This is a one-time cross-sectional survey study of approximately 200 self-identified black or African-American patients who have had chronic hepatitis C viral infection (HCV) that will evaluate patients' willingness to participate (WTP) in health/medical research related to HCV and attitudinal factors that might be associated with WTP, such as benefits and barriers to research participation, mistrust of physicians/researchers, health literacy, and knowledge of health/research studies.

详细描述

Chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection is three times more prevalent in the African American/black (AA) population than in white patients in the U.S.; yet minorities are woefully under-represented in HCV research, particularly in Phase III drug registration trials. A recent systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) of HCV treatments with interferon-based treatments from 2000 to 2011 found that the proportion of African-American patients in RCTs ranged from 0% - 11%. Despite significant increases in efficacy and reductions in adverse events associated with the new direct acting antiviral (DAA) regimens, the proportion of black patients enrolled in Phase II-III DAA registration trials has not increased dramatically and generally ranges from 1%-18%. Because participation rates in medical research do not fully represent the overall U.S. population or prevalence rates among various subgroups, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has mandated pharmaceutical companies to improve demographic subgroups included in clinical trials, to identify barriers to subgroup enrollment in clinical trials, and to employ strategies to encourage greater participation.

Enrolling more diverse patients in medical research, especially racial minorities, is a ubiquitous dilemma that has received a fair amount of scientific attention in the last 10 years. This research has found an important role for the perceptions and attitudes that people have about participating in clinical research. Negative perceptions serve as barriers to enrollment in clinical research, while positive attitudes are facilitators of research participation. Additionally, knowledge gaps, patient-provider communication, health literacy, and mistrust of research and scientists are a few of the commonly reported barriers to participation among minority patients. To our knowledge, no study has been undertaken with black patients with HCV to understand their specific attitudes and perspectives related to participation in HCV-related health or medical research. This information is a prerequisite to developing effective approaches to increasing participation of the black community in HCV-related health or medical research.

Two hundred Black patients will be recruited. Patients who participated in The Patient-Reported Outcomes Project of HCV-TARGET ("PROP UP TARGET") study will be invited to participate. Patients will also be recruited from liver clinics at one medical center. Patients will respond to several survey questions over the phone or in person related to WTP and attitudinal factors related to clinical research.

Participant responses and characteristics will be summarized using graphical and tabular descriptive statistical methods such as sample means, percentiles, frequencies, proportions and standard deviations. All statistical estimates will be reported with confidence intervals.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Other
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 99 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Overall Willingness to Participate (WTP) Mean Score

时间窗: through study completion, an average of 1 day

Overall Willingness to Participate Scale (WTP): WTP in research studies was evaluated using 13 items to assess WTP in different types of health/medical research studies. Responses were based on a five-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all willing) to 5 (very willing), with 3 connoting "unsure/neutral." The overall WTP score will be calculated for each participant by taking the mean of the 13 items. Higher scores indicate higher WTP.

次要结局

  • Perceived Barriers/Disadvantages of Participating in Health/Medical Research Mean Score(through study completion, an average of 1 day)
  • Perceived Benefits/Advantages of Participating in Health/Medical Research Mean Score(through study completion, an average of 1 day)
  • Perceived Trust in Doctors Mean Score(through study completion, an average of 1 day)
  • Perceived Health Literacy Mean Score(through study completion, an average of 1 day)
  • Subjective Knowledge of Health/Medical Research Mean Score(through study completion, an average of 1 day)
  • Objective Knowledge of Health/Medical Research Mean Score(through study completion, an average of 1 day)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验