Comparison between tele-rehabilitation and face to face rehabilitation in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000044592
- Lead Sponsor
- MGM College of Physiotherapy
- Brief Summary
Both the protocols showed statistically significant improvement for both pain, mobility and functional disability. However, Tele-rehabilitation was more effective with respect to Pain and functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with severe pain with a score of 8 and above on Numerical Pain rating scale, Patients with acute low back pain, patients with any infective or inflammatory low back pain and patients with neurological dysfunction and recent injuries.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method umerical Rating Scale (NRS)and Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire were used to measure Pain and Functional Disability at baseline, after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks of intervention
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Modified Schober's Test was used to measure Mobility of the Lumbar Spine at baseline, after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks of intervention