Comparative Study of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis With Remote Patient Management And Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis on the Prognosis and QOL in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 750
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Returning to society
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This is an observational, multicenter, parallel control study, planning to enroll 750 eligible patients to receive automated peritoneal dialysis with remote patient management (APD-RPM) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Patients will attend follow-up every 12 ± 1 weeks for a total of 156 weeks. This study aims to compare the effects of APD-RPM and CAPD treatment on the prognosis and quality of life.
Detailed Description
This is an observational study based on the real-word diagnosis and treatments. Target subject population include end-stage renal disease patients (aged 18-75 years) with peritoneal dialysis 3 months and longer. Standard peritoneal balance test of eligible patients should be rapid peritoneal solute transfer rate (4-hour D/P creatinine value > 0.65). Patients will be divided into two groups to receive standard APD-RPM or CAPD with a ratio of 1:2.
Peritoneal dialysis in APD-RPM group (n=250): (1) APD mode is recommended but not limited to continuous circulating peritoneal dialysis (CCPD); (2) Dialysis dose ranges from 5 to 10 liters per day and depends on previous APD prescription and dialysis adequacy; (3) Glucose concentration starts from low concentration (1.5%) and depends on previous dialysis prescription.
Peritoneal dialysis in CAPD group (n=500): (1) Dialysis dose ranges from 5 to 10 liters per day at the run-in period. For those with regular peritoneal dialysis, the original dose can be used according to the volume status and solute clearance effect in the past 3 months; (2) Exchange time and abdominal retention time is generally 2-5 times and 1 time at daytime and night, separately; (3) Glucose concentration includes 1.5%, 2.5% or 4.25%; (4) The treatments can be adjusted according to the change of residual renal function, peritoneal transport characteristics, volume status, solute clearance, clinical status and peritonitis.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Observational Model
- Cohort
- Time Perspective
- Prospective
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Aged 18 years to 75 years
- •Confirmed diagnosis of end-stage renal disease
- •Standard peritoneal balance test shows rapid peritoneal solute transfer rate, defined as 4 hours D/P creatinine value greater than 0.65
- •Be able to comply with the standard peritoneal dialysis treatment at home
- •Peritoneal dialysis time 3 months and longer
- •Fully understand the study and have signed the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- •Prepare for kidney transplantation within 3 years
- •Need combined treatment of hemodialysis
- •Be allergic to components of peritoneal dialysis fluid
- •Complicated with severe cardio-cerebrovascular diseases such as congestive heart failure, grade III and above of NYHA classification, acute myocardial infarction within 3 months, malignant arrhythmia requiring treatment, dilated cardiomyopathy, acute cerebral infarction or acute cerebral hemorrhage within 3 months, etc.
- •Complicated with serious liver diseases, such as cirrhosis or acute liver injury [Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 2 times greater the the normal]
- •Active or treated residual malignant tumors, HIV infection
- •Pregnant or lactating women at childbearing age who disagree to use effective contraceptives during the trial
- •History of alcohol or drug (illegal drugs) abuse
- •Unable to continue CAPD due to ultrafiltration failure
- •Mental retardation or mental illness
- •Patients who use icodextrin dialysate
- •Participation in other clinical trials in the past 3 months
- •Peritonitis in the past 3 months
- •Other situations decided by the investigator
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Returning to society
Time Frame: 156 weeks from baseline
Change of assessment of returning to society from the baseline
Quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: 156 weeks from baseline
Change of quality of life (QOL) score from the baseline
Composite endpoint of all-cause deaths/technical failure
Time Frame: 156 weeks from baseline
The time from baseline to all-cause death or technical failure
Secondary Outcomes
- Peritonitis(156 weeks from baseline)
- Hospitalization(Up to 156 weeks)
- Cardio-cerebrovascular events(Up to 156 weeks)
- Capacity overload(Up to 156 weeks)
- Hypertension and antihypertension drugs(Up to 156 weeks)
- Glomerular Filtration Rate(Up to 156 weeks)
- Prescription adjustment, outpatient follow-up and unplanned outpatient visits(Up to 156 weeks)
- Ultrafiltration rate(Up to 156 weeks)
- Nutritional status(24, 48, 72, 96 120, 144, 156 week)
- Adequacy of dialysis(Up to 156 weeks)
Investigators
Chen Xiangmei
Professor, Chief physician, Academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering
Chinese PLA General Hospital