跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03618888
NCT03618888已完成不适用

Pedagogical Aspects on Education in Basic Life Support: A Cluster Randomized Trial on Effectiveness, Comparing Different Educational Methods for Adults in the Society of Sweden.

University of Boras2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 2,623 人开始时间: 2014年3月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
2,623
试验地点
2
主要终点
Total score from Cardiff Test for retention at 6 months

研究概览

简要总结

Cardio vascular disease (CVD) including out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is still the leading cause of death in a global perspective. Start of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with automated external defibrillator (AED) may double or quadruple survival. Scientific research on education in Basic Life Support (BLS) in the society is active in different part of Europe but low in Sweden. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and retention after different training interventions in BLS and willingness to act in a real-life cardiac arrest situation in the society of Sweden, based on European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines. This is an experimental cluster randomized trial, including participants from a BLS education project in Sweden.

详细描述

Introduction: The single most important factor for survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is to minimize the time from cardiac arrest to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to provide an electric chock through the heart with an automated external defibrillator (AED). Early start with CPR-AED increases the chance of survival two to four times. It is therefore important that as many people as possible have knowledge to quickly identify SCA and to start CPR-AED.

In this research, education efforts are directed for the adult public at workplaces in Sweden. The Investigator have designed an intervention in accordance to guidelines from European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the Swedish national education for Basic Life Support (BLS).

This is a cluster randomized trial primarily comparing in the first study, instructor-led training as the control group and self-learning training as the experimental group. In the second study the Investigator plan to compare a preparatory web-education on CVD before the BLS training versus no web-education before the BLS. The Investigator have conducted quality tests on practical skills on BLS, administered questionnaires to the participants about theoretical knowledge, self-assessed confidence and willingness to act in a real-life SCA situation. It is crucial to be able to identify factors that affect knowledge and retention after BLS training and the willingness to intervene in an acute situation.

Background: With modern IT technology, several different options and learning strategies are available. At the same time pedagogical thoughts have emerged on learning. Education can be instructor-led or self-directed and with preparatory courses for theoretical knowledge. The quality of BLS skills and theoretical knowledge can be measured through validated instruments. Against this background, the research goal is to identify how the study can improve retention and which training methods for BLS that should be recommended for the public in the future.

Objectives: The overall objective is to increase survival from OHCA. The aim is to identify factors that affect retention and contributes to intended practical skills, theoretical knowledge and willingness to act after BLS training and whether these goals are affected by the type of training intervention.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Basic Science
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Total score from Cardiff Test for retention at 6 months

时间窗: 6 months after intervention

Total score from the modified instrument Cardiff Test on the participants individual practical skills and adherence to the Basic Life Support algorithm in retention-test at six months after intervention.

次要结局

  • Self-assessed experience on learning outcome at baseline and retention at 6 months(0 days + 6 months later)
  • Self-assessed confidence from questionnaires at baseline and retention at 6 months(0 days + 6 months later)
  • Theoretical knowledge on cardio vascular disease, symptoms and first actions from questionnaires at baseline and retention at 6 months(0 days + 6 months later)
  • Self-assessed theoretical knowledge from questionnaires at baseline and retention at 6 months(0 days + 6 months later)
  • Individual quality variables from PC SkillReporting System at baseline and at retention at 6 months.(0 days + 6 months later)
  • Self-assessed willingness from questionnaires at baseline and retention at 6 months(0 days + 6 months later)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Helene Bylow

RNAN, Master of Pedagogy, PhD Student, University of Gothenburg, University of Boras

University of Boras

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验