The Effects of Unstable Shoes on Chronic Low Back Pain
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Interventions
- Device: Unstable shoes (MBT)Device: Sham intervention (Adidas shoes)
- Registration Number
- NCT01384071
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Geneva
- Brief Summary
Some physicians, physiotherapists and nurses use or even suggest unstable shoes in cases of low back pain. No studies on the real effects of these shoes on low back pain in health care professions have been carried out and therefore as yet there is no real evidence of their effectiveness. Thus the investigators assume that wearing unstable shoes over a period of six weeks could reduce low back pain and functional disability due to the changes of the gait and posture and may increase the quality of life.
The purposes of this study are:
1. To evaluate the modifications of pain level, functional capacity and quality of life among individuals with moderate level of non-specific chronic low back pain after wearing unstable shoes.
2. To quantify biomechanical modifications of gait and posture.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Unstable shoes (MBT) Unstable shoes (MBT) MBT shoes (Masai Barefoot Technology, Switzerland) Stable shoes (Adidas) Sham intervention (Adidas shoes) Adidas stable shoes (Adidas Bigroar2)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline in low back pain at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks Low back pain level with the visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10;
Change from baseline in the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks functional disability with the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (this questionnaire has been validated in French as the Functional Disability Scale for the Assessment of Low Back Pain - Eifel)
Change from baseline in the EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks Quality of life with the EQ-5D.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline in gait speed at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks Seft-selected gait speed
Change from baseline in balance performance at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks center of pressure speed in conditions :
* eyes opened and eyes closed
* stable and unstable surfaceChange from baseline in ankle dorsiflexion during gait at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks Ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact during gait
Change from baseline in pelvis anteversion during gait at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks Mean pelvis anteversion during gait
Change from baseline in trunk anteversion during gait at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks Mean trunk anteversion during gait
Change from baseline in activation period of lower-limb muscles during gait at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks Activation period of lower-limb muscles (gasctrocnemius, peroneus, tibialis anterior, rectus femoris and semi-tendinosus) during gait
Change from baseline in activation period of erector spinae during gait at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks Activation period of erector spinae during gait
Change from baseline in maximum knee extension during gait stance phase at 6 weeks Baseline and 6 weeks Maximum knee extension during stance phase
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Hospitals of Geneva
🇨ðŸ‡Geneva, Switzerland