MedPath

Genetic Carbohydrate Maldigestion As Model to Study Food Hypersensitivity Mechanism (WORK PACKAGE 2)

Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Sucrase Isomaltase Deficiency
Registration Number
NCT06770907
Lead Sponsor
University of Nottingham
Brief Summary

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) affects one in seven people with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms that are detected without an established underlying organic cause. IBS strongly impacts quality of life, is a leading cause of work absenteeism, and consumes 0.5% of the healthcare annual budget. It manifests in women more than men with symptoms including abdominal pain, bloating, constipation (IBS-C), diarrhoea (IBS-D), and mixed presentations (IBS-M). The development of therapeutic options is hampered by the heterogeneity of IBS, the lack of specificity of its symptom-based definitions, and the poor understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Many people with IBS find that certain foods (particularly carbohydrates) trigger their symptoms and avoiding such foods has been shown to be effective in IBS. An example of such a diet is the low-FODMAP (fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols) exclusion diet, developed by researchers at Monash University. This has suggested that the food-symptom relation may involve malabsorption of carbohydrates due to inefficient enzymatic breakdown of polysaccharides. However, only a percentage of subjects respond to this diet. Overall, the current findings relating to SI, suggest a strong potential for effective personalized therapeutic (dietary) interventions in subgroups of IBS subjects and suggest similar mechanisms should be investigated in relation to other genes involved in the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates (CDGs). This project aims to understand what the mechanisms for GI symptoms in subjects with these genetic alterations are. Aim of the study is to assess the gut response to a sucrose challenge in single-and double-carriers of the common hypomorphic sucrase-isomaltase variant p. (Val15Phe) vs non- carriers (negative controls) and CSID subjects (positive controls), applying an MRI multiparametric test combined with a breath test.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Area under the curve0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300 minutes after the drink test

Area under curve (AUC) of the change from baseline for the MRI measured small bowel water content after the drink test with sucrose

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
MRI measured oro-caecal transit time0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300 minutes after the drink test

oro-caecal transit time (OCTT), (in arbitrary units) after the drink test

Stool microbiota taxonomicUp to 3 days before the MRI study

Analysis of of microbiota taxonomic in the two stool samples collected by patient during the day before the MRI study day

Stool microbiota alpha and beta diversity measurementsUp to three days before the MRI study day

Analysis of alfa and beta diversity of microbiota in the two stool samples collected by patient before the study day

Serum levels of short chain fatty acidsAt baseline and 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 minutes after the drink test

Serum levels

Habitual diet questionnaireduring 4 days before the MRI study

subject will report food eaten at each meal

MRI measured colon free water content0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300 minutes after the drink test

MRI measured colon free water content, (in arbitrary units) after the drink test

MRI measured small bowel and colon volume0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300 minutes after the drink test

small bowel and colon volume in arbritary units after drink test

Breath hydrogen and methane concentration measured in parts per million after drink testbaseline and then 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300 minutes after the drink test
Symptoms of nausea, gas/flatulence, bloating and pain/discomfort measured using a Composite Symptom Score after the drink test0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300 minutes after the drink test
Total glucose and fructose and excess fructose, lactose, sorbitol, mannitol, oligosaccharides (Fructans and GOS) as measured by Comprehensive Nutrition Assessment Questionnairetime 0

CNAQ questionnaires results

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scoretime 0

scale measuring the score of anxiety and depression

The Patient Health Questionnaire 12Time 0

Scale measuring the psychosomatic score

MRI measured small bowel and colon gas content0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300 minutes after the drink test

small bowel and colon gas content (in arbitrary units) after the drink test

Circulating blood glucose levelsBaseline and then 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300 minutes after the drink test
Serum levels of surrogates of intestinal permeability (occludin, lipopolysaccharide binding protein)At baseline and 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 minutes after the drink test

Serum levels

Serum levels of lipidome and free fatty acidsAt baseline and 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 minutes after the drink test

Serum levels

Serum levels of total serum N-glycome and glucoseAt baseline and 0, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 minutes after the drink test

Serum levels

Food and drink avoidance questionnaireat time 0

patients will respond to the below questions:

* Name of the food or drink you try to avoid.

* Please tell us if you try to avoid this food or drink partially or completely? Approximately how long you have tried to avoid this food or drink partially or completely.

Why do you try to avoid this food or drink partially or completely (including if you have been told to avoid it by a health care professional such as a doctor or dietitian)

Leeds Food Preference Questionnaireat time 0

The LFPQ consists of two tasks requiring different interaction from the participant. One task requires an explicit evaluation of each food item using visual analogue scales. The other requires a quick choice to be made between paired combinations of foods. The order of task completion is randomised.

Food Craving Questionnaire - State (FCQ-S)at time 0

participants respond to 14 questions about sugary food and they will respond with a scale from 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Nottingham

🇬🇧

Nottingham, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath