跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05270434
NCT05270434已完成不适用

Optimal Timing of Endoscopic Intervention After Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis With Pancreatic Stones.

Changhai Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 220 人开始时间: 2025年3月12日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
220
试验地点
1
主要终点
Successful MPD Cannulation Rates

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to determine the optimal timing of endoscopic intervention after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) of chronic pancreatitis with pancreatic stones.

详细描述

Chronic pancreatitis(CP)is a chronic progressive fibro-inflammatory disease of the pancreas induced by a wide range of factors including genetic and environmental elements, with recurrent abdominal pain and pancreatic secretion insufficiency as its major clinical signs. Chronic pancreatitis is not only a tough disease of the gastrointestinal system but also a worldwide medical problem. At present, the MESS (medicine-extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-surgery)formed by changhai hospital in CP diagnosis and treatment is gradually becoming mature, and the clinical effect of this system is obvious. However, there are still some difficulties and knowledge gaps in the clinical treatment of CP. Currently, it is recommended by both domestic and foreign guidelines that ERCP combined with ESWL as the first-line treatment pattern for patients with chronic pancreatitis associate pain. It has previously been observed that ERCP performed less than 2 days after ESWL may be more likely to fail, possibly owing to ESWL-induced edema. However, there is no high-quality research to demonstrate how to choose the most optimal timing of ERCP after ESWL for patients with indications for endoscopic treatment. This prospective, randomized controlled research has therefore aimed to determine the most optimal timing of ERCP after ESWL. Patients with painful chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic stones larger than 5 mm in diameter will be randomly and equally assigned to two groups, which are divided according to the time interval between ESWL and ERCP, including the same day (< 12 hours) subgroup and the next day ( ≥12 hours) subgroup. The cannulation success rate and stone clearance rate of the pancreatic duct will be assessed in each group to explore the most appropriate timing of ERCP, and then provide an important reference basis for the clinical treatment of chronic pancreatitis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • symptomatic adult patients diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis and main pancreatic duct positive stones(>5mm in diameter)
  • no ERCP and ESWL history before the admission
  • provides informed consent

排除标准

  • suspected to have malignant tumors;
  • history of pancreatic surgery or gastrojejunostomy (Billroth II);
  • with end-stage disease;
  • with contraindications to ESWL or ERCP, such as pregnancy, abdominal aortic aneurysm, etc.
  • acute pancreatitis within 3 days
  • pancreatic ascites

研究组 & 干预措施

Endoscopic group <12h

Experimental

The patients received intravenous analgesia (flurbiprofen and remifentanil) before the ESWL (Compact Delta II; Dornier Med Tech, Wessling, Germany). After the last ESWL session, the patients are treated with following ERCP within 12h. ERCP was performed under conscious sedation with intramuscular administration of diazepam 2.5-5.0 mg and pethidine 25-50 mg. If necessary, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed. A dilating bougie or balloon will be used to dilate the stenosis after sphincterotomy. Standard techniques (i.e., extraction basket, extraction balloon, or both) will be used for stone removal. A pancreatic duct stent for drainage and nasopancreatic catheters will be inserted for temporary drainage if necessary.

干预措施: time interval between ESWL and ERCP is 12h (Procedure)

Endoscopic group <12h

Experimental

The patients received intravenous analgesia (flurbiprofen and remifentanil) before the ESWL (Compact Delta II; Dornier Med Tech, Wessling, Germany). After the last ESWL session, the patients are treated with following ERCP within 12h. ERCP was performed under conscious sedation with intramuscular administration of diazepam 2.5-5.0 mg and pethidine 25-50 mg. If necessary, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed. A dilating bougie or balloon will be used to dilate the stenosis after sphincterotomy. Standard techniques (i.e., extraction basket, extraction balloon, or both) will be used for stone removal. A pancreatic duct stent for drainage and nasopancreatic catheters will be inserted for temporary drainage if necessary.

干预措施: morphine, buprenorphine, pethidine, tramaldol, metamizole and acetylsalicylacid (Analgesics) (Drug)

Endoscopic group ≥12 h

Active Comparator

The patients received intravenous analgesia (flurbiprofen and remifentanil) before the ESWL (Compact Delta II; Dornier Med Tech, Wessling, Germany). The time scale between the last ESWL session and following ERCP is greater than 12h. ERCP was performed under conscious sedation with intramuscular administration of diazepam 2.5-5.0 mg and pethidine 25-50 mg. If necessary, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed. A dilating bougie or balloon will be used to dilate the stenosis after sphincterotomy. Standard techniques (i.e., extraction basket, extraction balloon, or both) will be used for stone removal. A pancreatic duct stent for drainage and nasopancreatic catheters will be inserted for temporary drainage if necessary.

干预措施: time interval between ESWL and ERCP is greater than 12h (Procedure)

Endoscopic group ≥12 h

Active Comparator

The patients received intravenous analgesia (flurbiprofen and remifentanil) before the ESWL (Compact Delta II; Dornier Med Tech, Wessling, Germany). The time scale between the last ESWL session and following ERCP is greater than 12h. ERCP was performed under conscious sedation with intramuscular administration of diazepam 2.5-5.0 mg and pethidine 25-50 mg. If necessary, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed. A dilating bougie or balloon will be used to dilate the stenosis after sphincterotomy. Standard techniques (i.e., extraction basket, extraction balloon, or both) will be used for stone removal. A pancreatic duct stent for drainage and nasopancreatic catheters will be inserted for temporary drainage if necessary.

干预措施: morphine, buprenorphine, pethidine, tramaldol, metamizole and acetylsalicylacid (Analgesics) (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Successful MPD Cannulation Rates

时间窗: during ERCP procedure

technical success rate of pancreatic cannulation

次要结局

  • post-ERCP complications(30 days)
  • Successful clearance of MPD stones(during ERCP procedure)
  • severity of post-ERCP complications(30 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Zhuan Liao

professor

Changhai Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验