Comparative Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Treatment and Pharmacological Treatment for Non-acute Lumbar Disc Herniation : a Multi-centered, Pragmatic Randomized Controlled, Parallel-grouped Pilot Study
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- Sponsor
- Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
- Enrollment
- 36
- Locations
- 4
- Primary Endpoint
- Oswestry disability index (ODI)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study is a 2-armed parallel, multi-centered, pragmatic clinical trial that compares the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatment and pharmacological treatment for non-acute lumbar disc herniation.
Detailed Description
This study is a multi-centered, pragmatic clinical trial that compares the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatment and pharmacological treatment for non-acute lumbar disc herniation. The participants who voluntarily signed informed consent will be randomly assigned in 1:2 ratio to non-pharmacological group and pharmacological group and will receive the 8 weeks of intervention.
Investigators
Kyoung Sun Park
Chief, clinical study center
Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Numeric rating scale (NRS) score of radiating pain or low back pain 5 or more for recent 3 serial days.
- •Onset time of radiating pain occurred 3 months before enrollment.
- •Radiologically diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation in lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (L-spine MRI), which can explain lower extremity radiation pain and back pain
- •19-69 years old
- •participants who agreed and signed informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
- •Spine metastasis of cancer, acute fracture of spine, or spine dislocation
- •Progressive neurologic deficits or severe neurologic deficits
- •Soft tissue diseases that can induce low back pain(ie. cancer, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, gout,etc)
- •Presence of chronic underlying disease which can interfere the efficacy or interpretation (ie. stroke, myocardial infarct, kidney disease, dementia, diabetic neuropathy, epilepsy, etc)
- •Concurrent use of steroids, immunosuppressants, orpsychotropic medications or any other medication that can interrupt the study result
- •Hemorrhagic disease, severe diabetes or taking anticoagulant drug
- •Participants who took NSAIDs within 1 week
- •Pregnant or lactating women
- •Participants who had undergone lumbar surgery within 3 months
- •Participants who had participated in other clinical trial within 1 month, or have plan for participation in other trial during follow up period of this trial
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Oswestry disability index (ODI)
Time Frame: week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27
ODI is a functional disability questionnaire. The possible range of eachitem score is 0 to 5. Total score range is 0 (better outcome) to 100 (worse outcome)
Secondary Outcomes
- Visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain and radiating pain in lower extermities(week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27)
- Numeric rating scale (NRS) of radiating pain in lower extremities(week -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27)
- Short form-12 health survey version 2 (SF-12 v2)(week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27)
- Evaluation question(week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27)
- Drug Consumption(week -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27)
- Adverse events(week -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27)
- Numeric rating scale (NRS) of low back pain(week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 27)
- EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L)(week 1, 5, 9, 14, 27)
- Credibility and Expectancy(week -1)
- Patient global impression of change (PGIC)(week 9, 14, 27)