跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02847455
NCT02847455已完成2 期

Efficacy and Safety of Ilaprazole for Acute Duodenal Ulcer: A Randomized,Double-Blind,Rabeprazole-Controlled,Multicenterand Phase3 Trial in China in China

Livzon Pharmaceutical Group Inc.0 个研究点目标入组 408 人开始时间: 2008年8月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
408
主要终点
The primary endpoint was the healing rate of ulcers, which based on post-treatment (week 4) endoscopic changes in stage of the ulcer relative to baseline (week 0) levels.

研究概览

简要总结

Patients with endoscopically diagnosed active duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel and dose-ranging trial. They were randomly assigned into three groups to be treated for up to four weeks and be seen at week 1, 2 and 4: three of ilaprazole, 5, 10 mg/day, and one of Rabeprazole 10 mg/day as positive control. The primary endpoint was the ulcer healing rate at week 4. Healing of ulcer was determined by its resolution from active to scarring stage. Symptoms relief was evaluated as secondary end points by using a graded score. Safety and tolerability were evaluated on basis of clinical assessments.

详细描述

The primary endpoint was the healing rate of ulcers, which based on post-treatment (week 4) endoscopic changes in stage of the ulcer relative to baseline (week 0) levels. Stages of the ulcers were endoscopically assessed according to the degree of ulceration, regenerating epithelialization, and scarring, which was defined as follows: A stage (active stage, A1 & A2) where A1 stage is more severe than A2 stage, H stage (healing stage, H1 & H2) where H2 stage is better than H1 stage, and S stage (scarring stage, S1 (red scar) & S2 (white scar)) where S stage is the best stage in the three stages and S2 stage is better than S1.Healing of ulcer is deemed successful if an ulcer in A stage resolved to S stage at the end of the treatment period, regardless of S1 or S2. When endoscopy demonstrated successful ulcer healing, study medication was discontinued. Patients returned at week 2, and if unhealed further endoscopic assessment would be done at week 4. Secondary endpoints included post-treatment resolution of related gastrointestinal symptoms such as upper abdominal pain, heartburn, acid regurgitation, nausea & vomiting, eructation, and increased flatus. These symptoms were recorded on a scale ranging from 0 to 3(0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) at baseline, week 1, 2, and 4. Resolution of symptoms were defined as "excellence", "effective", "improved", or "ineffective" relative to baseline levels, of which complete symptom relief or complete absence of the symptom without recurrence was deemed as "excellence". Safety assessments based mainly on the occurrence, frequency, and severity of adverse events, which were monitored throughout the duration of the study, and also based on comprehensive indexes, including physical examination, electrocardiography, and routine laboratory investigations, which were performed at baseline and repeated at the end of the treatment period. For all adverse events, where necessary, patients were withdrawn from the study.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • - Consenting patients were eligible for enrollment if they:
  • were 18-65 years of age,
  • had endoscopically diagnosed active duodenal ulcers within the previous 72 hours,
  • the number of ulcers was at least one, but no more than two with the larger diameter 0.3-2.0cm.

排除标准

  • - Patients were ineligible if they:
  • had cancerous or complex ulcers, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, esophageal erosion or ulcer, varices of esophagus or fundus of stomach, or pyloric stenosis,
  • had a known history of gastric acid suppression operation, esophageal operation or peptic operation other than simple closure of perforation,
  • had severe complications (e.g., pyloric obstruction, active bleeding under endoscope), severe other diseases of digestive tract such as Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and severe other systemic diseases,
  • were female patients who were breast feeding, pregnant, or intended to become pregnant during the study,
  • had taken proton pump inhibitors within the 5 days or for more than three consecutive days within the two weeks immediately preceding start of study drug,
  • participated in a clinical trial with an investigational drug or device within the past three months,
  • had hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to omeprazole or any other benzimidazole,
  • had alcoholic intemperance, drug addiction or any other improper habits.

研究组 & 干预措施

5 mg ilaprazole

Experimental

干预措施: 5 mg ilaprazole (Drug)

10 mg ilaprazole

Experimental

干预措施: 10 mg ilaprazole (Drug)

10mg Rabeprazole

Active Comparator

干预措施: 10 mg Rabeprazole (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

The primary endpoint was the healing rate of ulcers, which based on post-treatment (week 4) endoscopic changes in stage of the ulcer relative to baseline (week 0) levels.

时间窗: week 4

次要结局

  • Secondary endpoints included post-treatment resolution of related gastrointestinal symptoms such as upper abdominal pain, heartburn, acid regurgitation, nausea & vomiting, eructation, and increased flatus.(week 4)

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验

Ilaprazole for the Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer in... | 临床试验