Artificial Intelligence + Care Coach Intervention
- Conditions
- CaregiverArtificial IntelligenceCare TransitionDementiaEmergency Department
- Registration Number
- NCT05352399
- Lead Sponsor
- Yale University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to develop and test an artificial intelligence intervention for emergency department (ED) discharge care transitions experienced by caregivers of older adults with cognitive impairment.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- age ≥65 years with a diagnosis of dementia within the electronic health record OR new cognitive impairment identified during an ED visit
- be fluent in English or Spanish
- discharge after an ED visit
- possession of a smart device (either a phone, tablet, or computer) that has internet access to utilize and interact with NeuViCare AI services
- evidence of delirium, by the 4-AT screening tool
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intervention Appropriateness Measure Day 7 and 30 Appropriateness is defined as the perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the innovation for a given setting or consumer, and/or perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. The measure consists of 4 questions, with an overall score range of 4-20 (higher scores suggest increased appropriateness). Administration time is 1-2 minutes. Measured by survey.
Feasibility of Intervention Measure Day 7 and 30 Feasibility is defined as the extent to which a new innovation can be successfully used or carried out within a given setting. The measure consists of 4 questions, with an overall score range of 4-20 (higher scores suggest increased feasibility). Administration time is 1-2 minutes. Measured by survey.
Acceptability of Intervention Measure Day 7 and 30 Acceptability is defined as the perception that a given innovation is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory. The measure consists of 4 questions, with an overall score range of 4-20 (higher scores suggest increased acceptability). Administration time is 1-2 minutes. Measured by survey.
System Usability Scale Day 7 and 30 Usability encapsulates several aspects including subjective component assessments of effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. The System Usability Scale consists of 10 questions on effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction, with an overall score range of 10-50 (higher scores suggest increased usability). Administration time is 3-5 minutes. Measured by survey.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality of Life (QOL) in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Scale (QOL-AD) Day 0, 7 and 30 Total score range 13-52; higher scores indicate better QOL.
Dyadic Relationship Scale (DRS) Day 0, 7 and 30 DRS to measure strain between the caregiver and recipient within the last 30 days. Total score range 4-20. High scores indicate high levels of strain.
Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale Day 0, 7 and 30 The Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale consists of 4 items with the total score ranging between 0-16. Higher scores indicate greater burden. Administration time is approximately 10-15 minutes. Measured by survey.
Fortinsky Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale Day 0, 7, and 30 Used to evaluate the coping ability of daily living. The measure has a total score range from 10-100, with higher scores representing greater self-efficacy. Administration time is approximately 3-5 minutes. Measured by survey.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Yale New Haven Hospital
🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Yale New Haven Hospital🇺🇸New Haven, Connecticut, United States