跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00600444
NCT00600444已完成不适用

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Venae Sectio Versus Punction of Vena Subclavia for Insertion of a Totally Implantable Access Port

Heidelberg University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2008年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Primary success rate of the randomized intervention

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this trial is to investigate if the success rate of punction the vena subclavia (99% in retrospective studies) will be 15% higher than the success rate of venae sectio (80% in retro and prospective studies) for implantation of a totally implantable access ports.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Age equal or greater than 18 years
  • •Patients scheduled for primary elective implantation of TIAP

排除标准

  • •Participation in another clinical trial which could interfere with the primary endpoint of this study
  • •Lack of compliance
  • •Impaired mental state or language problem
  • •Patients with known allergy to contrast agent

研究组 & 干预措施

A

Active Comparator

Venae Sectio technique will be used to insert totally implantable access port (TIAP) by a surgeon

干预措施: Venae sectio (Procedure)

B

Experimental

Punction of Vena Subclavia will be used to insert totally implantable access port (TIAP) by a radiologist.

干预措施: Punction of V. subclavia (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Primary success rate of the randomized intervention

时间窗: Assessed on the day of surgery (day 0)

次要结局

  • Peri-/postoperative complication rate for the randomized intervention(Assessed after 90 day post operation)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验