Dose-Tolerability Titration Study to Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Perampanel (E2007) In Patients With Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)
- Conditions
- Neuralgia
- Interventions
- Drug: PlaceboDrug: E2007 (perampanel)
- Registration Number
- NCT00592774
- Lead Sponsor
- Eisai Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Perampanel (E2007) in patients with Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 146
To be included, patients must meet the following:
-
Provide written informed consent, prior to entering the study or undergoing any study procedures.
-
Male and female patients ≥18 years of age. Females should be either of nonchildbearing potential as a result of surgery or menopause (1 year after onset), or of childbearing potential and practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception. Acceptable contraception includes: abstinence, a barrier method plus spermicide, or intrauterine device [IUD]. Those females using hormonal contraceptives must also be using an additional approved method of contraception (e.g., a barrier method plus spermicide or IUD). Contraceptive use must start at least 1 month before Visit 1, be practiced throughout the entire study period, and continue for 1 month after the end of the study. They must also have a negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) at Visit 1, and a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline Visit 2.
-
PHN of at least 6 months duration; the onset of PHN is defined as the time from healing of herpes zoster skin lesions.
-
Pain over the past 6 months, and not in a clinically identifiable improving or worsening trend, based on medical history.
-
Score of ≥ 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) of the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at both Visit 1 and Baseline (Visit 2 prior to randomization).
-
Have completed the patient diary for at least 6 of the 7 days prior to Visit 2 (Baseline).
-
Average daily pain score of ≥ 4, on 11-point Likert scale during the 7 days prior to randomization [from the diaries].
-
Reliable and willing and able to cooperate with all study procedures, including the following examples:
- Accurately entering the diary on a daily basis
- Returning for study visits on the required dates
- Accurately and reliably reporting symptoms (including treatment-emergent signs and symptoms)
- Taking study drug as required by protocol
-
Be on stable analgesic treatment (same medication(s)) or stable nonpharmacological pain treatment for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and remain on this stable treatment throughout the study. Nonpharmacologic pain treatment includes the following:
- relaxation/hypnosis
- physical or occupational therapy
- mental-health counseling
- acupuncture
- injections
- blocks, etc.
- Episodic or periodic pharmacologic treatments such as monthly injections for treatment of pain (eg, local anesthetics) will not be permitted.
- Up to 4 g of acetaminophen/day is permitted as rescue medication, as needed, during the trial.
Patients with any of the following are to be excluded:
-
Any condition that could interfere with the conduct of the trial or confound efficacy evaluations including the following examples: pain or neuropathy from another cause (including painful diabetic neuropathy), such as central pain, radiculopathy, painful arthritis, etc.
-
Motivation by secondary gain, or where there is a negative-incentive to achieving pain and functional relief (eg, litigation). This will be determined from the medical history and is at the discretion of the investigator.
-
Inability to cooperate with protocol, for any reason.
-
Clinically significant, progressive, or potentially unstable disease of any body system including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, CNS, psychiatric, endocrine, or immunologic, including patients with any of the following broad disease categories:
- Systemic infections (eg, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], hepatitis, tuberculosis [TB], syphilis); lack of appropriate medical history of these conditions is acceptable,
- History of past (within the past 12 months) or present drug or alcohol abuse as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual - 4th Edition (DSM IV) criteria,
- History of acute coronary syndrome within the past 12 months,
- Active cancer within the previous 5 years (the exception is fully treated, non-melanoma skin cancer such as basal cell carcinoma),
- Systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy within the past 5 years,
- History of major depression, bipolar disease, psychosis or suicidal ideation or attempts within the past 5 years,
- History of major systemic allergy such as anaphylactoid reactions or Stevens-Johnson syndrome (however, patients with limited allergies such as contact dermatitis or minor allergy to penicillin are acceptable).
-
Any of the following laboratory abnormalities at Visit 1:
- Clinically significant ECG abnormality, including prolonged QTc (defined as QTcB > 450 msec),
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN),
- Clinically significant abnormal white blood cell (WBC), absolute neutrophil, or platelet count values,
- Any other clinically significant laboratory value.
-
Exposure to an investigational drug within the 30 days prior to Visit 1 or exposure ever to perampanel.
-
Females who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the study.
-
Use of any medication known to be a strong inducer of CYP3A4 activity within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1; use of CYP3A4 inducers is prohibited for the entire study duration.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo Cohort 2 Placebo - Perampanel Cohort 2, 1-week Titration E2007 (perampanel) - Perampanel Cohort 2, 2- Week Titration E2007 (perampanel) - Placebo Cohort 1 Placebo - Perampanel Cohort 1, 3-week Titration E2007 (perampanel) -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline in Average Pain Scores to Week 15/ End of Treatment (EOT) (Including Modified BOCF Data) Baseline and Week 15 Average pain scores are based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale, where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain score for baseline was calculated using the average of the last 7 scores prior to randomization, and the average pain score for Week 15 was computed using the average of the last 7 on-treatment scores prior to Week 15, and they were reported by treatment group.
Responder Rate: Subjects With at Least 30 Percent Reduction in Pain Baseline and Week 15 A responder was a participant with at least 30 percent reduction in average pain scores, using modified BOCF, based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain score for baseline was calculated using the average of the last 7 scores prior to randomization, and the average pain score for Week 15 was computed using the average of the last 7 on-treatment scores prior to Week 15, and they were reported by treatment group.
Responder Rate: Subjects With at Least 50 Percent Reduction in Pain Baseline and Week 15 A responder was a participant with at least 50 percent reduction in average pain scores, using modified BOCF, based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain score for baseline was calculated using the average of the last 7 scores prior to randomization, and the average pain score for Week 15 was computed using the average of the last 7 on-treatment scores prior to Week 15, and they were reported by treatment group.
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Scores by Week Week 1 through Week 16 Change from baseline in average pain scores by week based on pain intensity (11-point Likert-type numerical scale where 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain), reported by the subjects in a daily diary. The average pain scores were calculated as the average of available scores in each week, and were reported by treatment group.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in Average Sleep Interference Scores Baseline and Week 15 The average of the last 7 available sleep scores prior to the visit, based on the 11-point Likert-type numerical rating scale for sleep interference (where 0=pain did not interfere with sleep, to 10=pain completely interfered with sleep \[unable to sleep\]), and they were reported by treatment group.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 15/EOT Week 15 Changes were calculated using the modified BOCF method
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Week 15/EOT Week 15 Changes were calculated using the modified BOCF method
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in HADS Anxiety Subscale Scores (Modified BOCF) Baseline and Week 15 The HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) is a widely used, self-reported, 14-item instrument that measures the presence and severity of anxiety and depression. It consists of 2 subscales; a 7-item anxiety subscale (HADS-A) and a 7-item depression subscale (HADS-D). HADS-A consists of a 7-item scale, each scored on a 4-pt scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), where a higher score indicates worse anxiety. Range of possible HADS anxiety subscale scores is 0 to 21, and normal=(0-7), mild=(8-10), moderate=(11-14), and severe=(15-21).
Change From Baseline to Week 15/EOT in HADS Depression Subscale Scores (Modified BOCF) Baseline and Week 15 The HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) is a widely used, self-reported, 14-item instrument that measures the presence and severity of anxiety and depression. It consists of 2 subscales; a 7-item anxiety subscale (HADS-A) and a 7-item depression subscale (HADS-D). HADS-D consists of a 7-item scale, each scored on a 4-pt scale (0, 1, 2, or 3), where a higher score indicates worse depression. Range of possible HADS depression subscale scores is 0 to 21, and normal=(0-7), mild=(8-10), moderate=(11-14), and severe=(15-21).
Analysis of Allodynia (Present/Not Present) at Week 15/EOT- by Treatment Groups ITT Population (Modified BOCF) Week 15 Allodynia is defined as a painful reaction to a non-painful stimulus.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pain and Rehabilitation Clinic of Chicago
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States