Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06598852
NCT06598852RecruitingNot Applicable

Comparison of Analgesic Effects of Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block, Erector Spinae Muscle Block, Thoracic Paravertebral Block Combined with Erector Spinae Muscle Block, and Intercostal Nerve Block in Thoracoscopic Surgery

The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao1 site in 1 country120 target enrollmentStarted: September 15, 2024Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
120
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Postoperative pain score

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Comparison of analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block, erector spinae muscle block, thoracic paravertebral block combined with erector spinae muscle block, and intercostal nerve block in thoracoscopic surgery

Detailed Description

120 patients undergoing elective thoracoscopic surgery were randomly divided into ESPB group (E group, n=30), TPVB group (T group, n=30), ESPB combine with TPVB group (ET group, n=30), ICNB group (I group, n=30). Patients in ESPB group underwent erector spinal block under ultrasound after anesthesia induction; Patients in TPVB group received thoracic paravertebral nerve block after anesthesia induction; Patients in ESPB group combined with TPVB group received thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with erectoralis muscle block after anesthesia induction; Patients in INB group received intraoperative intercostal nerve block by the operator. All groups of patients received postoperative controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain 1h (T1), 24h (T2) and 48h (T3) after surgery. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate at T1-T3 were recorded, as well as the number of effective analgesic pump compression, the amount of sufentanil and the number of relief analgesia within 48h after surgery. The occurrence of postoperative adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, retention time of thoracic drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia, atelectasis, pleural effusion, respiratory failure, etc.) were recorded.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • (1) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I-II; (2) Age: 18-70 years old (3) double-hole thoracic surgery was performed; (4) Agree to participate in this study and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • (1) People who are allergic to anesthetics used in this study; (2) Patients with coagulation disorders (3) patients with severe heart disease, liver or renal insufficiency; (4) have a history of chronic pain or chronic opioid users (5) have a co-existing mental illness and are not fully capable of cooperating

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Postoperative pain score

Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery

Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of pain 1h (T1), 24h (T2) and 48h (T3) after surgery, the number of effective analgesic pump compressions and the number of remedial analgesia within 48h after surgery.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Incidence of postoperative complications(48 hours after surgery)

Investigators

Sponsor
The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao
Sponsor Class
Other Gov
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials