Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01834352
NCT01834352
Withdrawn
Phase 1

Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill0 sitesStarted: November 2013Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Phase 1
Status
Withdrawn
Primary Endpoint
Effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy (WOIT) on clinical desensitization to a second tree nut.

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if walnut oral immunotherapy can be used in subjects allergic to tree nuts to decrease their tree nut allergy and induce changes in their immune system.

Detailed Description

Tree nut

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
6 Years to 45 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 6 to 45 years, either sex, any race, any ethnicity with a convincing clinical history of walnut or another tree nut allergy and either a positive prick skin test (\> 3mm) or serologic evidence of allergic sensitization (defined as specific IgE \> 0.35 kU/L) to walnut and at least one other tree nut.
  • A positive 2000 mg oral food challenge at enrollment to walnut and to one other tree nut.
  • Written informed consent from participant and/or parent/guardian
  • Written assent from all subjects as appropriate
  • All females of child bearing age must be using appropriate birth control

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of severe anaphylaxis to walnut or other tree nuts, defined as symptoms associated with hypoxia, hypotension or neurologic compromise (cyanosis or SpO2 \< 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse, loss of consciousness; or incontinence).
  • Known allergy to oat
  • Chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis) requiring therapy or other respiratory or medical conditions deemed by the investigator to put the subject at increased risk of anaphylaxis or poor outcomes from receiving OIT or undergoing food challenge.
  • Poor control or persistent activation of atopic dermatitis
  • Active eosinophilic or other inflammatory (e.g., celiac) gastrointestinal disease in the past 2 years.
  • Participation in any interventional study for food allergy in the past 6 months
  • Participant is on "build-up phase" of immunotherapy (i.e., has not reached maintenance dosing).
  • Severe asthma (2007 NHLBI Criteria Steps 5 or 6, see Appendix 2) or poorly controlled mild or moderate asthma
  • Inability to discontinue antihistamines for initial day escalation, skin testing or OFC
  • Use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunotherapy (e.g., oral or sublingual) or immunomodulator therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy within the past year

Arms & Interventions

Walnut protein flour

Active Comparator

Walnut protein flour that is ingested in gradually increasing amounts up to a maintenance dose.

Intervention: Walnut Protein Flour (Drug)

Oat flour

Placebo Comparator

Oat flour administered in identical increasing amounts as the active walnut protein flour.

Intervention: Oat flour (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy (WOIT) on clinical desensitization to a second tree nut.

Time Frame: 38 weeks

The determination of the effectiveness of WOIT in inducing clinical desensitization to a second tree nut to which the subject is allergic when compared to placebo. This will be measured by the change in the amount of tree nut the subject can consume during their food challenge at 38 weeks compared to their consumption during the baseline challenge at study entry.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percentage of subjects who can tolerate a 5000mg oral food challenge to walnut protein following the desensitization phase of the study(38 weeks)
  • The percentage of subjects who are able to reach a cumulative protein dose of 2000mg at the desensitization oral food challenge to walnut and the test tree nut.(38 weeks)
  • The percentage of subjects who demonstrate clinical tolerance at the end of the study to walnut and the test tree nut.(36 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Wesley Burks, MD

Professor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Similar Trials