Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03382080
NCT03382080CompletedNot Applicable

COMPLETE - a School-based Intervention Project to Improve Psychosocial Learning Environments and Increase Completion of Upper Secondary School in Norway: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

University of Bergen0 sites3,500 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2016Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
3,500
Primary Endpoint
Drop-out

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Drop out from upper secondary school represents a risk for the future health and wellbeing of young people. Strengthening of psychosocial aspects of the learning environment may be an effective strategy to promote completion of upper secondary school. The COMPLETE study is a school based cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating two school-based interventions, namely the Dream School Program (DSP) and the Mental Health Support Team (MHST) among 1st grade upper secondary school students in four counties in Norway. The interventions aim to improve psychosocial learning environments and subsequently school achievements and decrease drop-out and absence.

Specifically, the COMPLETE study will

  1. Evaluate whether the DSP alone

  2. increases completion

  3. increases presence

  4. improves school achievements

  5. improves mental health and wellbeing

  6. Evaluate whether the DSP and the MHST combined

  7. increase completion

  8. increase presence

  9. improve school achievements

  10. improve mental health and wellbeing

The COMPLETE study will also evaluate the effect of the DSP and MHST combined and the DSP alone against secondary outcomes of school satisfaction and loneliness. 3. Evaluate through a process evaluation whether the interventions were implemented in line with guidelines for each of the interventions, and whether the degree of program fidelity has influenced the effect of the interventions on the primary and secondary outcomes.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
15 Years to — (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •School inclusion criteria: not been or currently involved in either of the Dream School Program or the Mental Health Support Team or similar programs or research projects
  • •Student inclusion criteria: student enrolled at any of the included schools.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Schools previously or currently involved in either of the Dream School Program or the Mental Health Support Team or similar programs or research projects.
  • •Student exclusion criteria: students with special needs or who are illiterate in Norwegian are excluded from the survey assessment, but included in the interventions.

Arms & Interventions

Dream School Program (DSP)

Experimental

The Dream School Program is a whole school program, involving staff and students, with the aim of creating learning environments where students are confident and experience a sense of belonging, and where mental health is promoted.

Intervention: Dream School Program (Other)

DSP and Mental Health Support Team

Experimental

A combination of the universal Dream Schoop Program (see description above) and the selective/indicative intervention Mental Health Support Team which is aimed at specific students at risk of dropping out of upper secondary school. It is a systematization of the student services through

  1. Co-location of services and staff working in services
  2. "One open door" to increase accessibility to the services and staff for students
  3. Focus on the transition from lower to upper secondary school
  4. Close follow-up of students at risk to ensure tailored help to each student
  5. Early intervention and follow up when students starts being absent from school

Intervention: Mental Health Support Team (Other)

DSP and Mental Health Support Team

Experimental

A combination of the universal Dream Schoop Program (see description above) and the selective/indicative intervention Mental Health Support Team which is aimed at specific students at risk of dropping out of upper secondary school. It is a systematization of the student services through

  1. Co-location of services and staff working in services
  2. "One open door" to increase accessibility to the services and staff for students
  3. Focus on the transition from lower to upper secondary school
  4. Close follow-up of students at risk to ensure tailored help to each student
  5. Early intervention and follow up when students starts being absent from school

Intervention: Dream School Program (Other)

Control

No Intervention

The control group are upper secondary schools who run classes and the school as usual, and do not introduce new programs similar to the Dream School or Mental Health Support Team during the project period.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Drop-out

Time Frame: Each participant is assessed after 58 months

If the student has not complete upper secondary school within five years or if the student quit school and is without any regular activity during the course of the study period, i.e. grade 1-3 of upper secondary school

Absence

Time Frame: Each participant is assessed after 34 months

Total days and hours absent at closure of third school year in upper secondary school

Change from baseline Mental Wellbeing at 18 months

Time Frame: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months

Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS), on a 5 point Likert scale from None of the time to All of the time, with higher values indicating a better outcome

Academic achievement

Time Frame: Each participant is assessed after 34 months

Average grade at closure of third school year in upper secondary school

Change from baseline Mental Health at 6 months

Time Frame: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months

Short form of Symptom Check List (SCL-5), on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from Not bothered to Very bothered, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.

Change in Mental Wellbeing from baseline at 6 months

Time Frame: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months

Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS), on a 5 point Likert scale from None of the time to All of the time, with higher values indicating a better outcome

Change from baseline Mental Health at 18 months

Time Frame: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months

Short form of Symptom Check List (SCL-5), on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from Not bothered to Very bothered, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.

Change from baseline Mental Health at 30 months

Time Frame: Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months

Short form of Symptom Check List (SCL-5), on a 4 point Likert scale ranging from Not bothered to Very bothered, with higher values indicating a worse outcome.

Drop-out

Time Frame: Each participant is assessed after 10 months

If the student has not complete upper secondary school within five years or if the student quit school and is without any regular activity during the course of the study period, i.e. grade 1-3 of upper secondary school

Drop-out

Time Frame: Each participant is assessed after 22 months

If the student has not complete upper secondary school within five years or if the student quit school and is without any regular activity during the course of the study period, i.e. grade 1-3 of upper secondary school

Drop-out

Time Frame: Each participant is assessed after 34 months

If the student has not complete upper secondary school within five years or if the student quit school and is without any regular activity during the course of the study period, i.e. grade 1-3 of upper secondary school

Absence

Time Frame: Each participant is assessed after 10 months

Total days and hours absent at closure of first school year in upper secondary school

Absence

Time Frame: Each participant is assessed after 22 months

Total days and hours absent at closure of second school year in upper secondary school

Academic achievement

Time Frame: Each participant is assessed after 10 months

Average grade at closure of first school year in upper secondary school

Academic achievement

Time Frame: Each participant is assessed after 22 months

Average grade at closure of second school year in upper secondary school

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change from baseline School satisfaction at 6 months(Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6, 18 and 30 months)
  • Change from baseline School satisfaction at 18 months(Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months)
  • Change from baseline School satisfaction at 30 months(Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months)
  • Change from baseline Loneliness at 6 months(Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 6 months)
  • Change from baseline Loneliness at 18 months(Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 18 months)
  • Change from baseline Loneliness at 30 months(Based on self-report in survey assessment at baseline and 30 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Torill Bogsnes Larsen

Professor

University of Bergen

Similar Trials