A Retrospective Analysis of a Complete Enseal Laparoscopic Vaginal Assisted Hysterectomy Versus a Traditional Suture Laparoscopic Vaginal Hysterectomy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 79
- 主要终点
- Surgical time
研究概览
简要总结
Retrospective charts review from one surgeon to compare Group A- cases where the laparoscopic portion of the case used an EN~SEAL device to Group B - the laparoscopic BSO was done using a 3mm EN-SEAL device through 2 lateral 5mm ports.
详细描述
79 women with benign uterine disease underwent laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Subjects charts were divided into two groups based on surgical technique and the following parameters were reviewed retrospectively: surgical time, blood loss, uterine weight, patient weight, patient age, post operative fever >100.4 F, readmission to hospital within one week, return to operating room within 24 hours, length of hospital stay, and blood transfusion. Group A, N=35 used traditional suture technique vaginally. Group B, N=44 used Enseal coagulation cutting device vaginally.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 35 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •none, observational study
排除标准
- •none, observational study
结局指标
主要结局
Surgical time
时间窗: Operating room time in minutes
The total time the subject spent in surgery was compared between the two groups
Estimated blood loss
时间窗: Blood loss during surgery in cc per minute
The total blood loss in cc per minutes operating was compared between the two groups
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Kathryn OKeeffe MD
MD
Womens Care
