PROJECT CHOICE: Efficacy Testing of Motivational Interviewing (MI) for Adolescents Referred for Substance Use Concerns
试验速览
- 阶段
- 1 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 48
- 主要终点
- % Readiness to Change
研究概览
简要总结
This study will use a pilot test format to examine the efficacy of a brief Motivational Interviewing (MI) intervention developed by the investigator Dr. Douglas Smith called CHOICE (Compassionate Helpers Openly Inviting Client Empowerment)with youth referred for substance abuse assessments to substance abuse treatment agencies in Chicago and Urbana, IL.
详细描述
This study will use a pilot test format to examine the efficacy of a brief Motivational Interviewing (MI) intervention developed by the investigator Dr. Douglas Smith called CHOICE (Compassionate Helpers Openly Inviting Client Empowerment)with youth referred for substance abuse assessments to substance abuse treatment agencies in Chicago and Urbana, IL. The study will have two arms: one group will receive the standard CHOICE Motivational Interview (MI) while the second group will receive the CHOICE Motivational Interview with a Normative Feedback component, called CHOICE+ (CHOICE Plus). The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in outcomes between those that receive the standard CHOICE and those that receive the CHOICE+ MI.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 13 Years 至 19 Years（Child, Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Youth 13-19 years of age (and their parents or legal guardians if their youth has been referred for an assessment with the Prairie Center counseling staff.)
- •referred for an assessment to see if they need substance use disorder treatment
- •have used substances on 13 or more days out of the past 90 days or scored higher than 2 on the CRAFT assessment. -
排除标准
- •Low cognitive functioning
研究组 & 干预措施
Motivational Interview
The Motivational Interview, or MI, (15-30 minutes) was provided after initial substance use disorder assessments but prior to treatment admission. I twas facilitated by a computer generated report and included: an orientation to the session, discussion of the participants' strengths, an agenda setting procedure, a review of concerns, and a session summary. Therapists conveyed empathy, used reflective listening, tried to elicit and reinforce change talk elements, and elicited action steps from the participants.
干预措施: Motivational Interview (Behavioral)
MI with Normative Feedback
The Motivational Interview with Normative Feedback, or MI + NF, condition/intervention included all procedures described for the MI condition. Additionally, in the MI + NF condition/intervention, the participants' days of marijuana and alcohol use were compared to two sets of norms ( age specific or level of care specific) available for treatment attending youth. Therapists used whichever norm provided a greater contrast with participants' use.
干预措施: Motivational Interview with Normative Feedback (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
% Readiness to Change
时间窗: Day One
% Readiness to Change was measured immediately following receipt of the intervention session.
次要结局
- Days of Substance Use Treatment(3 months post intake)
研究者
Douglas Smith
Assistant Professor Douglas Smith
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign