MedPath

Comparison of the Functional Walking Outcomes of Two Settings of a Commercially Available AFO in Adult Stroke Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Walking Aided by a Leg Brace in Stroke Subjects
Interventions
Device: ADR™ brace resistance
Device: Conventional brace resistance (using hard stops)
Registration Number
NCT02122783
Lead Sponsor
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how two different settings of a commercially available ankle foot brace affect how stroke patients walk. The study brace is an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) that makes use of a newer type of joint that contains a soft insert, in addition to the conventional hard stops, to limit the range of motion of the ankle during walking. The results of this study will help to clarify 1) whether and how this new joint affects the way you walk, 2) whether it makes it easier for the clinician to align your brace and 3) your opinions about the new joint.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how two different settings of a commercially available ankle foot brace affect how stroke patients walk. The study brace is an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) that makes use of a newer type of joint that contains a soft insert, in addition to the conventional hard stops, to limit the range of motion of the ankle during walking. Participants undergo testing in the gaitlab after using the new brace for a period of time. The results of this study will help to clarify 1) whether and how this new joint affects the way you walk, 2) whether it makes it easier for the clinician to align your brace and 3) your opinions about the new joint.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
5
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Between the ages of 21 and 70 males and non-pregnant females
  2. Diagnosis of stroke more than 1 year ago
  3. Ambulatory at 0.5m/s or greater
  4. Require unilateral AFOs to ambulate
  5. Stable medical condition - no concomitant progressive diseases that could affect motor function
  6. Ability to comply with directions and cooperate with research team
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Subjects who are currently receiving physical therapy for gait problems
  2. Anticipated surgical or pharmacologic intervention for tone/contractures during the study period
  3. Additional neurologic or musculoskeletal diagnoses that might impair gait (i.e., recent orthopedic interventions (6 weeks), unhealed fractures, significant degenerative joint disease, lower limb amputation, uncontrolled seizures)
  4. Recent cardiac or active pulmonary disease, liable blood pressure
  5. Recent back surgery
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Experimental then Conventional brace resistanceADR™ brace resistanceParticipants received the the novel elastomer to provide brace support intervention for a period of a month, were evaluated in the lab and then the conventional intervention was administered for use for the next month. There was a small period (few hours in the lab) where the subject was transitioned to the second intervention.
Conventional then Experimental brace resistanceConventional brace resistance (using hard stops)Participants received the Default intervention for a period of a month, were evaluated in the lab and then the novel intervention was administered for use for the next month. There was a small period (few hours in the lab) where the subject was transitioned to the second intervention.
Conventional then Experimental brace resistanceADR™ brace resistanceParticipants received the Default intervention for a period of a month, were evaluated in the lab and then the novel intervention was administered for use for the next month. There was a small period (few hours in the lab) where the subject was transitioned to the second intervention.
Experimental then Conventional brace resistanceConventional brace resistance (using hard stops)Participants received the the novel elastomer to provide brace support intervention for a period of a month, were evaluated in the lab and then the conventional intervention was administered for use for the next month. There was a small period (few hours in the lab) where the subject was transitioned to the second intervention.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Step Time Symmetry8 weeks

step time symmetry will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat). symmetry will result in a ratio of step time on more involved or affected side compared to the less involved or affected (i.e. the "normal") side. as such, the measure will appear to have no units but actually will be a ratio of the same units (in this case, seconds to seconds).

Self-selected Walking Velocity8 weeks

walking velocity will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat)

Step Length Symmetry8 weeks

step length symmetry will be assessed by an electronic temporospatial foot-fall measurement system (gaitmat). symmetry will result in a ratio of step length on more involved or affected side compared to the less involved or affected (i.e. the "normal") side. as such, the measure will appear to have no units but actually will be a ratio of the same units (in this case, meters to meters).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Joint Kinematics8 weeks

joint kinematics will be assessed using motion capture system

Joint Kinetics8 weeks

joint kinematics will be assessed using motion capture and biomechanical force measurement systems

Subject Opinions8 weeks

subject opinions will be measured using surveys and questionnaires

Activity (Step Count)8 weeks

activity will be measured using accelerometer based step activity monitoring devices

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

MossRehab

🇺🇸

Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath