Is Supervised or Homebased Resistance Training the Best Treatment for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy? And When Needed is Supplement Treatment With Either Corticosteroid or High Volume Injection the Best Choice
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中（未招募）
- 入组人数
- 90
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Change from baseline in The Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles Questionnaire (VISA-A).
研究概览
简要总结
Achilles tendinopathy is a common and often long-lasting injury among exercising individuals.
The primary purpose of the study is to compare treatment with supervised or homebased resistance training. The secondary purpose is to compare treatment with either corticosteroid or High Volume Injection (HVI) for those patients not responding to the primary treatment.
The tertiary purpose is to evaluate the effect of surgery in those patients not responding to the primary and the secondary treatment.
It is hypothesized that:
- Homebased resistance training is as effective as supervised resistance training for treating chronic achilles tendinopathy
- HVI injection is better than CS injection for those patients not responding sufficiently to treatment 1
- Surgery improves symptoms in patients not responding to treatment 1 and treatment 2
Study 1: 90 patients between 18 and 65 years of age with achilles tendinopathy for at least 3 months are randomly assigned to either A. Resistance training at home instructed via a smart phone training app and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months B. Heavy slow resistance training in the gym instructed by a physiotherapist and avoidance of pain aggravating activities for 3 months
Outcomes are change in patient reported outcome (VISA-A) from baseline to 3 and 6 months, ultrasound measured thickness and dopler activity of the achilles tendon, self reported activity level in percentage of the pre injury activity level.
After the 3-month training intervention, and for the following 9 months, those patients that not are satisfied with the outcome will have the opportunity to participate in the second part of the study.
Study 2: Patients from study 1 which not are satisfied with the outcome are randomly assigned to either
A. Same training intervention continued + High Volume Injection (HVI) B. Same training intervention continued + corticosteroid injection
After the 4-month and for the following 8 months, those patients that not are satisfied with the outcome will have the opportunity to participate in the third part of the study.
Study 3: Patients from study 2 which not are satisfied with the outcome are operated
详细描述
Achilles tendinopathy is a common and often long-lasting injury among exercising individuals. Treatment options typically include rest from high load weight bearing activities, resistance training, injections with corticosteroid (CS) or High Volume Injection (HVI) and surgery.
The primary purpose of the study is to compare treatment with supervised or homebased resistance training.
The secondary purpose is to compare treatment with either corticosteroid or High Volume Injection (HVI) for those patients not responding to the primary treatment.
The tertiary purpose is to evaluate the effect of surgery in those patients not responding to the primary and the secondary treatment.
It is hypothesized that:
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Pain from the achilles tendon either unilateral or bilateral for at least 3 months
- •Achilles tendinopathy in the tendon midtsubstance verified by ultrasound
- •Between 18 and 65 years of age
- •For patients with unilaterale symptoms the symptomatic tendon must be at least 20% thicker than on the asymptomatic side or more than 7 mm thick
- •For patients with bilateral symptoms the achilles tendons must have diameters above 7 mm
排除标准
- •Prior surgery in the leg with the exception of knee artroscopy
- •Known medial conditions including diabetes or rheumatologic diseases
- •Taking pain medication regularly
- •Injection therapy for treatment of achilles tendinopati within the last 6 months
结局指标
主要结局
Change from baseline in The Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles Questionnaire (VISA-A).
时间窗: After 3 and 6 months in study 1. After 6 months in study 2. After 6 and 12 months in study 3.
VISA-A is a patient reported outcome measure (PROM). Change from baseline is measured and reported. The scale ranges from 0-100 points. Higher score meaning a better outcome.
次要结局
- Ultrasonographic measurement of achilles tendon thickness and doppler activity.(After 0, 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months in study 1 and study 2. After 3, 6 and 12 months in study 3.)
- Patient self reported activity level in percentage of the pre-injury activity level.(After 6, 9 and 12 months in study 1 and study 2. After 3, 6 and 12 months in study 3.)
- Evaluation of treatment effect measured on an 11-point Likert scale.(After 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months in study 1 and study 2. After 3, 6 and 12 months in study 3.)
- Change from baseline in The Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles Questionnaire (VISA-A).(After 1, 2, 9 and 12 months in study 1. After 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months in study 2. After 3 months in study 3.)
- Evaluation of the training experience measured on a Likert scale.(After 3 months in study 1. After 3 months in study 2.)
研究者
Simon Doessing, M.D., PhD
Senior Surgeon
Bispebjerg Hospital