The spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric Lokalanästhestikum performed in the lateral position, compared to general anesthesia in outpatient anesthesia, in terms of effectiveness, process times, hemodynamic stability, perioperative complications, and postoperative pai
Recruiting
- Conditions
- M23M17Internal derangement of kneeGonarthrosis [arthrosis of knee]
- Registration Number
- DRKS00004906
- Lead Sponsor
- niversitätsmedizin GöttingenZentrum Anästhesiologie, Rettungs- und Intensivmedizin
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
Inclusion Criteria
Be included in the study 120 male or female patients who undergo elective outpatient arthroscopy of the knee joint. This included 60 patients who received anesthesia as a unilateral spinal anesthesia and 60 patients receiving general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
Unsuitability for the anesthetic procedure
Study & Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1 Process times SPA vs. general an.<br>- Time to implement the spinal anesthesia /general anesthesia., beginning OP<br>- Time seam, recovery<br>- Dismissal time recovery<br>- Staff retention time recovery<br>2 Unilateral spinal anesthesia, by testing the sensory / motor blockade<br>- Objective testing with measurement of sympatic activity by measuring the skin conductance (ESG-Electric sympatho graphy)<br><br><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method perioperative complications - anesthetic protocol<br>postoperative pain - Questionnaire