Effects of Strength Exercise on Fall Risk in Elderly With Alzheimer's Disease
- Conditions
- Fall RiskAlzheimer DiseaseDementia; Alzheimer's Type (Etiology)ElderlyResistance Training
- Registration Number
- NCT04981587
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Jaén
- Brief Summary
Interventional study to show the effects of strength exercise on fall risk in elderly with Alzheimer's disease
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 64
- accept to participate in the study, through informed consent
- subjects aged 60 or over with medical diagnosis of Azlheimer´s disease
- minimal physical and mental state to perform the cognitive tests and strength exercise routine
- Neurodegenerative disease other than Alzheimer's disease
- Suffering from serious somatic or psychiatric illnesses
- Patients who have practiced strength exercise regularly
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline Short physical performance battery (SPPB) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) Informs about fall risk and mobility Score: 0-12 High score means better result
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline FRAIL test at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This rapid test allows to determine the state of frailty of older people Score: 0-5 High score means worst result
Change from baseline One Maximum repetition strength test (1 MR) at 1,2,3 and 6 months Baseline, 1 , 2 , 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) Allows you easily to assess maximum strength Score: 0-∞ High score means more strength level
Change from baseline Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale (IADL) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This tool gives us information about performance in activities of daily living Score: 0-8 High score means better result
Change from baseline Quality of life Alzheimer Disease (QoL-AD) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) Through this test we can know the level of quality of life of users who suffer from this disease Score: 0-52 High score means better result
Change from baseline Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-Q) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This tool allows to specify the neuropsychiatric symptoms patients present Score: 0-36 High score means worst result
Change from baseline Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This test gives us information about the cognitive performance of the participants Score: 0-30 High score means better result
Change from baseline Activities specific balance confidence scale (ABC scale) at 3 and 6 months Baseline, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This questionnaire allows to measure the balance of a person Score: 0-100% High percentage means better result
Change from baseline Manual dynamometry at 1,2,3 and 6 months Baseline, 1, 2, 3 and 6 months (3 months after intervention) This test allows to quantify force an individual presents in a simple way Score: 0-∞ High score means better result
Modified Borg scale 3 times/week during strength exercises sessions In this way we can measure the level of perceived exertion during the intervention with strength exercise Score: 0-10 High score means more fatigue
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
A.F.A La Estrella
🇪🇸Jaén, Andalucía, Spain
Alexander achalandabaso
🇪🇸Alcalá De Henares, Madrid, Spain
A.F.A La Estrella🇪🇸Jaén, Andalucía, Spain