跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04520438
NCT04520438已完成不适用

Effect of Leucocyte and Platelet Rich Fibrin as an Adjuvant in Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Universidad de los Andes, Chile2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 13 人开始时间: 2019年10月30日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
13
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change from baseline pocket probing depth at 6 weeks

研究概览

简要总结

Abstract:

Background: Leucocyte and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) has shown to promote regenerative processes, even reporting antibacterial effect. The aim of this split-mouth clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of L-PRF as an adjuvant to scaling and root planing (SRP).

Methods: 13 patients with chronic periodontitis and at least 1 bilateral periodontal pocket ≥ 6 mm were recruited. The sites were randomly treated with SRP + L-PRF (test group) or SRP alone (control group). The following parameters were evaluated at baseline and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after treatment: Probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP); gingival recession (GR), and root sensitivity (RS). Additionally, the concentrations of Porphyromona gingivalis (P.g), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A.a), Prevotella intermedia (P.i) and Fusobacterium nucleatum (F.n) in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks and 3 months after treatment.

详细描述

Materials and Methods Study design and Patient Selection A split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolling 13 patients (8 males and 5 females, mean age 52.3 ± 9.4 years) was set-up. The patients were informed about the benefits and risks of the study and each participant signed informed consent.

Non-surgical periodontal treatment A single periodontist (L.C.) performed all periodontal treatments. NSPT consisted of two sessions of scaling and root planing (SRP) within 48 hours under local anesthesia using ultrasonic and hand instrumentation. Additionally, the sites associated with PPD ≥ 6 mm in the quadrant assigned to the test group were irrigated with L-PRF exudate and filled with longitudinal pieces of L-PRF membrane. The patients received instructions about soft diet, a carefully and soft mouth rinse with chlorhexidine 0.12%, and no toothbrushing during 7 days in order to avoid the L-PRF removal. After this period, the following instructions were given: modified Bass brushing technique, dental floss, and interdental brushes, and chlorhexidine 0.12% mouth rinse for an extra 7 days. Strict hygiene control by the clinician was also performed in each appointment.

L-PRF membrane preparation Two samples of venous blood were collected in 2 vacutainer tubes (red cup) of 10 ml without anticoagulant. They were centrifuged at 408 g for 12 minutes using a table centrifuge (IntraSpinTM, Intralock®, Florida, USA) according to the protocol described by Temmerman et al.18 The L-PRF clots were removed from the tube, separated from the red cells and placed in the Xpression box (IntraSpinTM, Intralock®, Florida, USA) to gently compress them in membranes. The membranes were chopped in longitudinal pieces to fill the periodontal pockets ≥ 6mm. The exudate, released during the compression, called L-PRF exudate was aspirated to rinse the treated pockets. (Figure 1)

Clinical Measurements All clinical measurements were performed by a single trained and calibrated examiner (N.J.) who was masked for the treatment assigned, using a basic examination instrument kit and a University of North Carolina no. 15 color-coded periodontal probe. The following clinical parameters were measured at baseline and 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after treatment: probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), bleeding on probing (BOP), and O´Leary plaque index (PI).19 Additionally, the root sensitivity (RS) was evaluated using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 indicating no pain, 50 indicating average, and 100 indicating an unbearable pain) at 24 hrs., 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. The change in PPD, CAL, GR, BOP, PI, and RS (difference between baseline measures and at 1, 3, and 6 months) were calculated.

GCF collection GCF samples were collected from the deepest pocket from each quadrant before recording the clinical measurement (baseline, and 6 weeks and, 3 months after treatment) in order to evaluate the concentration of Porphyromona gingivalis (P.g), Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A.a), Prevotella intermedia (P.i) and Fusobacterium nucleatum (F.n). The sample area was isolated with cotton rolls, and contamination with saliva was avoided using an appropriate suction and air spray. Then, an endodontic #35 paper-point was inserted until a slight resistance was felt and it was held for 30 seconds. The paper-points were immediately inserted in an Eppendorf tube and stored at -80ºC for future analysis.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Only the clinician who provided the treatment knew the treatment assigned. A different clinician performed all the evaluations.

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • age between 30 and 70 years old
  • diagnosis of chronic periodontitis
  • at least one bilateral periodontal pocket ≥ 6 mm
  • healthy patients

排除标准

  • inability to comply with the study protocol
  • receiving antibiotic therapy or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during the previous two months or using calcium channel blockers, phenytoin, cyclosporine, or any associated drug that might affect gingival tissue
  • periodontal treatment during the previous 12 months
  • auto-immune disorders (self-reported)
  • requiring antibiotic prophylaxis before periodontal treatment; or requiring non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for postoperative pain management after periodontal treatment
  • smokers >10 cigarettes
  • pregnancy/lactation.

结局指标

主要结局

Change from baseline pocket probing depth at 6 weeks

时间窗: 6 weeks

Change from baseline to 6 weeks of the distance from the gingival margin to the base of the clinical pocket for each site. Unit: millimeters

Change from baseline pocket probing depth at 6 months

时间窗: 6 months

Change from baseline to 6 months of the distance from the gingival margin to the base of the clinical pocket for each site. Unit: millimeters

Change from baseline pocket probing depth at 3 months

时间窗: 3 months

Change from baseline to 3 months of the distance from the gingival margin to the base of the clinical pocket for each site. Unit: millimeters

次要结局

  • Change from baseline clinical attachment level at 3 months(3 months)
  • Change from baseline gingival recession at 6 weeks(6 weeks)
  • Change from baseline gingival recession at 3 months(3 months)
  • Change from baseline gingival recession at 6 months(6 months)
  • Change from baseline O´Leary plaque index at 6 weeks(6 weeks)
  • Change from baseline O´Leary plaque index at 6 months(6 months)
  • Change from baseline clinical attachment level at 6 weeks(6 weeks)
  • Change from baseline clinical attachment level at 6 months(6 months)
  • Change from baseline microbiological assessment in gingival crevicular fluid at 6 weeks(6 weeks)
  • Change from baseline bleeding on probing at 3 months(3 months)
  • Change from baseline bleeding on probing at 6 months(6 months)
  • Change from baseline root sensitivity at 24 hours(24 hours)
  • Change from baseline root sensitivity at 6 months(6 months)
  • Change from baseline bleeding on probing at 6 weeks(6 weeks)
  • Change from baseline O´Leary plaque index at 3 months(3 months)
  • Change from baseline root sensitivity at 6 weeks(6 weeks)
  • Change from baseline root sensitivity at 3 months(3 months)
  • Change from baseline microbiological assessment in gingival crevicular fluid at 3 months(3 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Catherine Andrade

Principal investigator

Universidad de los Andes, Chile

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验