跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01295281
NCT01295281已完成不适用

A Prospective, Randomized, Cross-over Study - Evaluation of a New Catheter Material for Intermittent Catheterization

Wellspect HealthCare12 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 107 人开始时间: 2011年3月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
107
试验地点
12
主要终点
Number of Participants With Discomfort

研究概览

简要总结

The hypothesis to be investigated is if the tolerability of intermittent catheterization with Polyolefin Based Elastomer (POBE) 2.0 and Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) is clinically equal - i.e. clinically non-inferior when using POBE 2.0 compared to PVC.

Secondary objectives are to evaluate the safety and the subject's perception associated with the use of the catheters, assessed by the recording of adverse events and the ease of handling by means of a subjective assessment scale.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Male
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Provision of informed consent
  • Males, aged 18 years and over
  • Maintained urethra sensibility
  • Practice intermittent self-catheterization at least 2 times daily
  • Using catheters in the length of 40 cm and size charrière (Ch) 12 or Ch 14
  • Experienced practitioners of intermittent self-catheterization defined as a minimum of three months on therapy
  • Experience of using LoFric catheter within the last 12 months prior to study entry
  • Adults able to read, write and understand information given to them regarding the study

排除标准

  • Ongoing, symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) at enrolment as judged by investigator
  • Known urethral stricture at enrolment as judged by investigator
  • Involvement in the planning and/or conduct of the study (applies to both Astra Tech staff or staff at the study site)
  • Previous enrolment or randomisation of treatment in the present study

结局指标

主要结局

Number of Participants With Discomfort

时间窗: At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively

The primary objective of this study is to compare the subject's tolerability, with regards to perceived discomfort, when using two different urinary catheters. Perception of discomfort (yes/ no) will be assessed in patient questionnaire for each subject. The frequency of discomfort will be compared between the treatments.

次要结局

  • Perception of Pain(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Perception of Burning Sensation(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Presence of Bleeding(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Perception of "Other Discomfort"(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Perception of Stiffness/ Rigidity(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Perception of Catheter Eyes(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Perception of Catheter Adherence(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Perception of Catheter Tip(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Perception of Slipperiness(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Perception of Smoothness(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Perception of Resistance(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)
  • Perception of Discomfort Due to Other Causes(At 7 and 14 days after randomization, respectively)

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (12)

Loading locations...

相似试验