A Comparative Pilot Study on the Effectiveness of Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral Guided by Nurse-Led and LINE Robot Interventions
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 150
- 主要终点
- Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation Rate
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this pragmatic randomized trial is to compare the effectiveness of nurse-led versus LINE bot-guided strategies on patient referrals for cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or status post coronary artery bypass surgery, aged 18 years and older. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does a nurse-led referral strategy increase cardiac rehabilitation referrals, attendance, and participation compared to routine care? Can a LINE bot-guided system improve cardiac rehabilitation referrals, attendance, and participation? Researchers will compare Intervention Group A (nurse-led face-to-face education), Intervention Group B (LINE bot automated referral system), and a Control Group (routine care) to see if nurse-led or LINE bot strategies are more effective in increasing referrals, attendance, and participation in cardiac rehabilitation programs.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to one of three groups. Participate in either nurse-led education, receive automated LINE bot reminders, or undergo standard care.
Have their cardiac rehabilitation referrals, attendance, and participation tracked for 12 weeks post-discharge through the hospital's medical record system.
This study seeks to provide healthcare professionals with evidence-based strategies for improving cardiac rehabilitation processes and enhancing patient engagement in rehabilitation programs.
详细描述
This comparative pilot study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) referral systems using two different intervention strategies: nurse-led education and LINE robot-guided interventions. The study's objective is to assess whether these methods can improve referral rates, attendance, and participation in CR programs compared to standard care.
Background:
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) account for a significant proportion of global deaths and have remained the second leading cause of death in Taiwan for many years. Despite the proven benefits of CR-such as reducing mortality rates by 13%-24%, improving physical activity, enhancing cardiac function, and lowering healthcare costs-its implementation is far from ideal. International data suggest that only 20%-25% of eligible patients actually participate in CR programs.
CR is recommended for a wide range of cardiac conditions, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and heart failure (HF). Effective referral mechanisms are critical for ensuring that patients have access to these services. However, referral rates for CR are significantly lower than other secondary prevention measures, such as medication adherence.
Study Design and Interventions:
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 99 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Adult ≧18 years old
- •AMI(STEMI or NSTEMI after PCI)
- •Heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I-III .
- •After coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
- •Patients must have a smartphone with internet
- •Able to use the LINE messaging (send and receive messages)
排除标准
- •Cardiac rehabilitation absolute or relative contraindications.
- •Acute decompensated heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV
- •Cognitive impaired
- •Without smartphones
- •Attending physician finds it unsuitable.
- •One patient was enrolled in the same ward
结局指标
主要结局
Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation Rate
时间窗: 12 weeks post-discharge
The percentage of patients who are referred to and actively engage in cardiac rehabilitation programs after discharge. Active participation is defined as attending at least one session of a cardiac rehabilitation program within the 12-week period following discharge from the hospital.
次要结局
未报告次要终点